Abstract
The article discusses the legality of the American missile strike on Syria on 6 April 2017, that was initiated in response to the Assad regime's alleged (repeated) use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war. While the academic debate about the legality under international law of the strike has primarily focused on the legality of humanitarian interventions in the traditional sense, the article argues that the strike should instead be discussed as an example of a particular form for humanitarian intervention; one that merely seeks to deter a state from using chemical weapons against civilians. This seems clear from both official US statements about the strike and from the international reactions to the military operation. The article then provides an overview of the strong international norm against chemical warfare and discusses the potential development of-and likely criteria for-a right in international customary law to use force to deter a state from using chemical weapons against civilians.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Conflict and Security Law |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 33-48 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISSN | 1467-7954 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
