TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment with the long-acting insulin analog degludec during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes
T2 - An observational study of 22 cases
AU - Keller, Maria Fredsgaard
AU - Vestgaard, Marianne
AU - Damm, Peter
AU - Mathiesen, Elisabeth Reinhardt
AU - Ringholm, Lene
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Aim: To report glycemic control and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes on insulin degludec. Methods: Twenty-two women with type 1 diabetes on degludec from conception to delivery between 2014 and 2018 were compared with 51 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes on glargine. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, however HbA1c was higher at median 9 (range 5–19) weeks in women on degludec compared to women on glargine (6.9% (5.7–8.7); (52 (39–72) mmol/mol) versus 6.4% (5.1–10.1); (46 (32–87) mmol/mol), p = 0.04). HbA1c was similar in late pregnancy (6.3% (5.6–7.1); (45 (38–54) mmol/mol) versus 6.1% (5.2–9.0); (43 (33–75) mmol/mol), p = 0.28). The prevalence of severe hypoglycemia was 3 (14%) versus 6 (12%), p = 1.00 during pregnancy and 0 versus 1, p = 1.00 during hospital admittance after delivery. Most women on degludec used one daily injection in early (20 (91%) versus 25 (49%), p = 0.001) and late pregnancy (21 (96%) versus 19 (37%), p < 0.001). No significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were found between the groups. Maternal hospital admittance after delivery was 2 (1–5) versus 3 (2–11) days (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Glycemic control in late pregnancy, severe hypoglycemia during and immediately after pregnancy as well as pregnancy outcome were comparable in women on degludec or glargine. Degludec initiated preconceptionally may be continued in pregnancy.
AB - Aim: To report glycemic control and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes on insulin degludec. Methods: Twenty-two women with type 1 diabetes on degludec from conception to delivery between 2014 and 2018 were compared with 51 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes on glargine. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, however HbA1c was higher at median 9 (range 5–19) weeks in women on degludec compared to women on glargine (6.9% (5.7–8.7); (52 (39–72) mmol/mol) versus 6.4% (5.1–10.1); (46 (32–87) mmol/mol), p = 0.04). HbA1c was similar in late pregnancy (6.3% (5.6–7.1); (45 (38–54) mmol/mol) versus 6.1% (5.2–9.0); (43 (33–75) mmol/mol), p = 0.28). The prevalence of severe hypoglycemia was 3 (14%) versus 6 (12%), p = 1.00 during pregnancy and 0 versus 1, p = 1.00 during hospital admittance after delivery. Most women on degludec used one daily injection in early (20 (91%) versus 25 (49%), p = 0.001) and late pregnancy (21 (96%) versus 19 (37%), p < 0.001). No significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were found between the groups. Maternal hospital admittance after delivery was 2 (1–5) versus 3 (2–11) days (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Glycemic control in late pregnancy, severe hypoglycemia during and immediately after pregnancy as well as pregnancy outcome were comparable in women on degludec or glargine. Degludec initiated preconceptionally may be continued in pregnancy.
KW - Degludec
KW - Glycemic control
KW - Hypoglycemia
KW - Pregnancy outcome
KW - Type 1 diabetes
U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.004
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31102682
AN - SCOPUS:85065793115
SN - 0168-8227
VL - 152
SP - 58
EP - 64
JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
ER -