TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment strategies and outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma among 1011 patients aged 75 years or older
T2 - A Danish population-based cohort study
AU - Juul, Maja Bech
AU - Jensen, Pernille Hammershoej
AU - Engberg, Henriette
AU - Wehberg, Sonja
AU - Dessau-Arp, Andriette
AU - Haziri, Donika
AU - Kristensen, Helene Bjoerg
AU - Baech, Joachim
AU - Schurmann, Lene
AU - Clausen, Michael Roost
AU - Valentin, Rebecca
AU - Knudsen, Lene Meldgaard
AU - Munksgaard, Lars
AU - El-Galaly, Tarec Christoffer
AU - Frederiksen, Henrik
AU - Larsen, Thomas Stauffer
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Optimal treatment strategy for the oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, as this group often is precluded from clinical trials, and population-based studies are limited. Methods: All Danish DLBCL-patients ≥75 years diagnosed from 2003 to 2012 were identified, using the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). Information regarding baseline characteristics, treatment, comorbidities and outcomes was retrieved from LYFO, the Danish National health registries and medical records. Patients were stratified by age (75–79; 80–84 and 85 + years), comorbidity score and treatment modality (standard treatment [R-CHOP/CHOP-like], less intensive regimens or palliative treatment). Findings: A total of 1011 patients were included. Standard treatment was initiated in 64%, ranging from 83% among patients aged 75–79 years to 32% among patient aged 85 + years. With standard treatment, median overall survival (OS) estimates were 4·6, 2·6, and 1·9 years for the age groups 75–79, 80–84 and 85+ years. Among patient aged 75–79 and 80–84 years, OS was superior with standard treatment, although high comorbidity scores attenuated this association. Among patients aged 85+ years, survival was not influenced by treatment intensity. Patients ≥80 years had similar OS regardless of intended (R-)CHOP dosing, whereas patients of 75–79 years scheduled for full dose had higher OS. Standard treatment was not associated with increased hospitalisation. Interpretation: Standard treatment is feasible with good outcomes in a large proportion of elderly DLBCL-patients. Planned dose reduction in patients aged ≥80 years had no negative impact on OS.
AB - Background: Optimal treatment strategy for the oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, as this group often is precluded from clinical trials, and population-based studies are limited. Methods: All Danish DLBCL-patients ≥75 years diagnosed from 2003 to 2012 were identified, using the Danish National Lymphoma Registry (LYFO). Information regarding baseline characteristics, treatment, comorbidities and outcomes was retrieved from LYFO, the Danish National health registries and medical records. Patients were stratified by age (75–79; 80–84 and 85 + years), comorbidity score and treatment modality (standard treatment [R-CHOP/CHOP-like], less intensive regimens or palliative treatment). Findings: A total of 1011 patients were included. Standard treatment was initiated in 64%, ranging from 83% among patients aged 75–79 years to 32% among patient aged 85 + years. With standard treatment, median overall survival (OS) estimates were 4·6, 2·6, and 1·9 years for the age groups 75–79, 80–84 and 85+ years. Among patient aged 75–79 and 80–84 years, OS was superior with standard treatment, although high comorbidity scores attenuated this association. Among patients aged 85+ years, survival was not influenced by treatment intensity. Patients ≥80 years had similar OS regardless of intended (R-)CHOP dosing, whereas patients of 75–79 years scheduled for full dose had higher OS. Standard treatment was not associated with increased hospitalisation. Interpretation: Standard treatment is feasible with good outcomes in a large proportion of elderly DLBCL-patients. Planned dose reduction in patients aged ≥80 years had no negative impact on OS.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Comorbidity and treatment
KW - DLBCL
KW - Elderly
KW - R-CHOP
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.006
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29935491
AN - SCOPUS:85048707250
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 99
SP - 86
EP - 96
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -