Abstract

In public campaigning and NGO mobilization against hate crimes, tolerance is often called upon as the antidote to hate. Yet, while tolerance in its classical liberal versions is a balanced negative attitude in contexts of profound disagreements, when mobilized in the context of fighting hate, tolerance loses its negative emotional component. This happens, the chapter argues, because the anti-hate activities promote an understanding of difference (racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, etc.) in which acts and beliefs are largely invisible. Instead, what is foregrounded is political being. Such an understanding of difference may work well to underscore the irrationality of harboring hate against them, but it significantly alters the meaning of tolerance. When the fundamental message in the anti-hate mobilization is that these differences are illegitimate sites of aversion, what we are left with is a simplified dichotomy between either hate or tolerance as benign acceptance or even warm embrace.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHate, Politics, Law : Critical Perspectives on Combating Hate
Number of pages18
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication date1 Jan 2018
Chapter8
ISBN (Print)9780190465544
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
SeriesStudies in Penal Theory and Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tolerance: An appropriate Answer to Hate?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this