To what extent do experts agree?: A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators

Peter Sandøe; Björn Forkman; Rikke Nøhr; Matt Denwood; Thomas Bøker Lund

To what extent do experts agree? A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators

Peter Sandøe, Björn Forkman, Rikke Nøhr, Matt Denwood, Thomas Bøker Lund

Section for Consumption, Bioethics and Governance

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances : Why Is It Still So Difficult?
Number of pages	1
Place of Publication	Wheathampstead, UK
Publisher	Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
Publication date	Jun 2017
Pages	32
Publication status	Published - Jun 2017
Event	UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium - Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom Duration: 27 Jun 2017 → 29 Jun 2017

Conference

Conference	UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium
Location	Royal Holloway, University of London
Country/Territory	United Kingdom
City	Egham, Surrey
Period	27/06/2017 → 29/06/2017

Access to Document

UFAW Conference 2017Final published version, 1.35 MB

https://www.ufaw.org.uk/downloads/ufaw-symposium-royalh-2017---conference-booklet-v3-online.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

Sandøe, P., Forkman, B., Nøhr, R., Denwood, M., & Lund, T. B. (2017). To what extent do experts agree? A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators. In Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances: Why Is It Still So Difficult? (pp. 32). Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. https://www.ufaw.org.uk/downloads/ufaw-symposium-royalh-2017---conference-booklet-v3-online.pdf

To what extent do experts agree? A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators. / Sandøe, Peter ; Forkman, Björn; Nøhr, Rikke et al.

Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances: Why Is It Still So Difficult?. Wheathampstead, UK : Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, 2017. p. 32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference abstract in proceedings › Research

Sandøe, P , Forkman, B, Nøhr, R, Denwood, M & Lund, TB 2017, To what extent do experts agree? A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators. in Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances: Why Is It Still So Difficult?. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Wheathampstead, UK, pp. 32, UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom, 27/06/2017. <https://www.ufaw.org.uk/downloads/ufaw-symposium-royalh-2017---conference-booklet-v3-online.pdf>

@inbook{8e8a42b53acf4d0ba3d794d84cbbb71b,

title = "To what extent do experts agree?: A study of perceived validity of animal welfare indicators",

author = "Peter Sand{\o}e and Bj{\"o}rn Forkman and Rikke N{\o}hr and Matt Denwood and Lund, {Thomas B{\o}ker}",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

language = "English",

pages = "32",

booktitle = "Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances",

publisher = "Universities Federation for Animal Welfare",

note = "UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium ; Conference date: 27-06-2017 Through 29-06-2017",

}

TY - ABST

T1 - To what extent do experts agree?

T2 - UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium

AU - Sandøe, Peter

AU - Forkman, Björn

AU - Nøhr, Rikke

AU - Denwood, Matt

AU - Lund, Thomas Bøker

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

SP - 32

BT - Measuring Animal Welfare and Applying Scientific Advances

PB - Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

CY - Wheathampstead, UK

Y2 - 27 June 2017 through 29 June 2017

ER -