Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World

T2 - Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power

AU - Rosamond, Ben

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Research Highlights and Abstract: A sympathetic critique of the literature on 'Normative Power Europe' that incorporates economic liberalism into the repertoire of the EU's constitutive principles. The derivation of three ideal type liberal modes of justification for external action and a discussion of their potential complementarities and contradictions. An application of the three modes to the case of EU external action. This article-a sympathetic critique of the literature on 'Normative Power Europe'-observes that the rationales for EU external action, while understandable in terms of the concept of 'normative power', emerge from a variety of overlapping and potentially contradictory liberal arguments. For the purposes of the argument, these liberalisms are organised into three ideal types: market liberalism, the pursuit of peace through liberal means and the ethic of cosmopolitan duty. The article suggests that while it is possible to associate different domains of EU external action with different varieties of liberal discourse, it is often more appropriate to see these policy domains as sites of struggle, negotiation and (perhaps) reconciliation between competing liberal projects.

AB - Research Highlights and Abstract: A sympathetic critique of the literature on 'Normative Power Europe' that incorporates economic liberalism into the repertoire of the EU's constitutive principles. The derivation of three ideal type liberal modes of justification for external action and a discussion of their potential complementarities and contradictions. An application of the three modes to the case of EU external action. This article-a sympathetic critique of the literature on 'Normative Power Europe'-observes that the rationales for EU external action, while understandable in terms of the concept of 'normative power', emerge from a variety of overlapping and potentially contradictory liberal arguments. For the purposes of the argument, these liberalisms are organised into three ideal types: market liberalism, the pursuit of peace through liberal means and the ethic of cosmopolitan duty. The article suggests that while it is possible to associate different domains of EU external action with different varieties of liberal discourse, it is often more appropriate to see these policy domains as sites of struggle, negotiation and (perhaps) reconciliation between competing liberal projects.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - European Union

KW - normative power

KW - liberalism

KW - ethics

U2 - 10.1111/1467-856x.12013

DO - 10.1111/1467-856x.12013

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1369-1481

VL - 16

SP - 133

EP - 148

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

IS - 1

ER -