The true incidence of cryptorchidism in Denmark

Dina Cortes, Emma M Kjellberg, Mette Breddam, Jørgen Mogens Thorup

    72 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Considerable controversy exists regarding the recently published high prevalence of cryptorchidism and the actual orchiopexy rate in Denmark. Therefore, we carried out another prevalence study. Materials and Methods: The study population included 1,094 consecutive males delivered alive at Glostrup University Hospital during 2002, with a 4-year review of patient data and telephone contact with primary physicians. Results: At birth the overall frequency of cryptorchidism was 2.4% (26 of 1,088 cases, 23% bilateral). The frequency of cryptorchidism in singletons was 2.4% (24 of 1,012 patients). The frequency of cryptorchidism in patients with a birth weight of 2,500 gm or more was 2.1%, compared to 8.2% in those with a birth weight of less than 2,500 gm (chi-square p<0.05). The frequency of cryptorchidism in twins was 2.6% (2 of 76). The frequency of birth weight below 2,500 gin was 51% (39 of 76) in twins and 4.9% (50 of 1,012) in singletons (chi-square p<0.00005). The weight of the placenta was higher in twins (median 1,000 gm) than in singletons (650 gm). At age 4 years 1.6% of the boys had undergone or were waiting to undergo surgery for cryptorchidism, and 0.6% had a diagnosis of retractile testes. Conclusions: In a small cohort of newborns the incidence of cryptorchidism in Denmark has not changed, and is similar to previous reports from the 1950s. The risk is higher in low birth weight singleton neonates but does not appear to be higher in twins, despite lower birth weight and prematurity
    Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Urology
    Volume179
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)314-318
    Number of pages5
    ISSN0022-5347
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • Cryptorchidism
    • Denmark
    • Humans
    • Incidence
    • Infant, Newborn
    • Male
    • Retrospective Studies

    Cite this