Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Copenhagen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Press/Media
Activities
Prizes
???studenttheses???
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
The relative importance of community forests, government forests, and private forests for household-level incomes in the Middle Hills of Nepal
Bishwa Nath Oli
*
,
Thorsten Treue
,
Carsten Smith-Hall
*
Corresponding author for this work
Section for Global Development
8
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The relative importance of community forests, government forests, and private forests for household-level incomes in the Middle Hills of Nepal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Nepal
100%
Community Forest
100%
Forest Income
100%
Household Level
100%
Middle Hills
100%
Community Forestry
50%
Community Forest User Group
33%
Income Inequality
33%
Total Household Income
33%
Forest Trees
16%
Group Level
16%
Rural Poverty
16%
Poverty Measures
16%
Managed Forests
16%
Poverty Reduction
16%
Economic Importance
16%
Elite Capture
16%
Rural Income
16%
Western Nepal
16%
Forest Extraction
16%
Top Incomes
16%
Poverty & Inequality
16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Private Forest
100%
Nepal
100%
Community Forestry
100%
Household Income
66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rural Poverty
33%