The Qualitative Expectations Hypothesis: Model Ambiguity, Consistent Representations of Market Forecasts, and Sentiment

Roman Frydman, Søren Johansen, Anders Rahbek, Morten Nyboe Tabor

    Abstract

    We introduce the Qualitative Expectations Hypothesis (QEH) as a new approach
    to modeling macroeconomic and financial outcomes. Building on John Muth's seminal insight underpinning the Rational Expectations Hypothesis (REH), QEH represents the market's forecasts to be consistent with the predictions of an economistís model. However, by assuming that outcomes lie within stochastic intervals, QEH, unlike REH, recognizes the ambiguity faced by an economist and market participants alike. Moreover, QEH leaves the model open to ambiguity by not specifying a mechanism determining specific values that outcomes take within these intervals. In order to examine a QEH model's empirical relevance, we formulate and estimate its statistical analog based on simulated data. We show that the proposed statistical model adequately represents an illustrative sample from the QEH model. We also illustrate how estimates of the statistical model's parameters can be used to assess the QEH model's qualitative implications.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages38
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    SeriesUniversity of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)
    Number17-10
    ISSN1601-2461
    SeriesInstitute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series
    Number59

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • Asset-Price Movements
    • Model Ambiguity
    • Models with Time-Varying Parameters
    • REH
    • Behavioral Finance
    • GAS Models
    • rational expectations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Qualitative Expectations Hypothesis: Model Ambiguity, Consistent Representations of Market Forecasts, and Sentiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this