The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group

Shai Dothan

The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group

Centre of Excellence for International Courts and Governance

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

States have a significant influence on the selection of judges to international courts. This raises the concern that judges will be biased in favor of their home states, a concern backed by some empirical research. To counter that danger, international courts usually sit in large and diverse panels. Scholars have argued that this gives judges only rare occasions to tip the balance in favor of their home states. The problem begins, however, when judges start forming coalitions among themselves, giving judges with national biases a practical possibility to change the result of cases. To assess the magnitude of this threat to judicial independence, the paper draws on decades of scholarship in the field of judicial behavior. By understanding how judges behave, scholars can come closer to deciphering the true impact of judicial selection to international courts on international judgments.

Original language	English
Journal	German Law Journal
Volume	19
Issue number	7
Pages (from-to)	2165-2188
Number of pages	24
ISSN	2071-8322
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2018

Access to Document

Vol_19_No_7_DothanFinal published version, 366 KBLicence: Other

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/5c16ca0270a6ad4215895773/1544997379257/Vol_19_No_7_Dothan.pdfLicence: Other

Cite this

@article{08519aca1ad642a8901628babce7b81d,

title = "The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group",

abstract = "States have a significant influence on the selection of judges to international courts. This raises the concern that judges will be biased in favor of their home states, a concern backed by some empirical research. To counter that danger, international courts usually sit in large and diverse panels. Scholars have argued that this gives judges only rare occasions to tip the balance in favor of their home states. The problem begins, however, when judges start forming coalitions among themselves, giving judges with national biases a practical possibility to change the result of cases. To assess the magnitude of this threat to judicial independence, the paper draws on decades of scholarship in the field of judicial behavior. By understanding how judges behave, scholars can come closer to deciphering the true impact of judicial selection to international courts on international judgments. ",

author = "Shai Dothan",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "2165--2188",

journal = "German Law Journal",

issn = "2071-8322",

publisher = "German Law Journal",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group

AU - Dothan, Shai

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - States have a significant influence on the selection of judges to international courts. This raises the concern that judges will be biased in favor of their home states, a concern backed by some empirical research. To counter that danger, international courts usually sit in large and diverse panels. Scholars have argued that this gives judges only rare occasions to tip the balance in favor of their home states. The problem begins, however, when judges start forming coalitions among themselves, giving judges with national biases a practical possibility to change the result of cases. To assess the magnitude of this threat to judicial independence, the paper draws on decades of scholarship in the field of judicial behavior. By understanding how judges behave, scholars can come closer to deciphering the true impact of judicial selection to international courts on international judgments.

AB - States have a significant influence on the selection of judges to international courts. This raises the concern that judges will be biased in favor of their home states, a concern backed by some empirical research. To counter that danger, international courts usually sit in large and diverse panels. Scholars have argued that this gives judges only rare occasions to tip the balance in favor of their home states. The problem begins, however, when judges start forming coalitions among themselves, giving judges with national biases a practical possibility to change the result of cases. To assess the magnitude of this threat to judicial independence, the paper draws on decades of scholarship in the field of judicial behavior. By understanding how judges behave, scholars can come closer to deciphering the true impact of judicial selection to international courts on international judgments.

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2071-8322

VL - 19

SP - 2165

EP - 2188

JO - German Law Journal

JF - German Law Journal

IS - 7

ER -

The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this