The liability threshold model for censored twin data

Klaus K. Holst*, Thomas Scheike, Jacob B. Hjelmborg

*Corresponding author for this work
19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Family studies provide an important tool for understanding etiology of diseases, with the key aim of discovering evidence of family aggregation and to determine if such aggregation can be attributed to genetic components. Heritability and concordance estimates are routinely calculated in twin studies of diseases, as a way of quantifying such genetic contribution. The endpoint in these studies are typically defined as occurrence of a disease versus death without the disease. However, a large fraction of the subjects may still be alive at the time of follow-up without having experienced the disease thus still being at risk. Ignoring this right-censoring can lead to severely biased estimates. The classical liability threshold model can be extended with inverse probability of censoring weighting of complete observations. This leads to a flexible way of modelling twin concordance and obtaining consistent estimates of heritability. The method is demonstrated in simulations and applied to data from the population based Danish twin cohort to describe the dependence in prostate cancer occurrence in twins.

Original languageEnglish
JournalComputational Statistics & Data Analysis
Volume93
Pages (from-to)324–335
Number of pages12
ISSN0167-9473
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Competing risks
  • Cumulative incidence
  • Heritability
  • Liability-threshold
  • Polygenic model
  • Probit model
  • Random effects
  • Right censoring
  • Twins

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The liability threshold model for censored twin data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this