The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy

Christian Jons; Uffe G Jacobsen; Rikke Moerch Joergensen; Niels Thue Olsen; Ulrik Dixen; Arne Johannessen; Heikki Huikuri; Marc Messier; Scott McNitt; Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen; Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction  study group

doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy

Christian Jons, Uffe G Jacobsen, Rikke Moerch Joergensen, Niels Thue Olsen, Ulrik Dixen, Arne Johannessen, Heikki Huikuri, Marc Messier, Scott McNitt, Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction study group

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The incidence and risk associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Objective: This study sought to describe the incidence and clinical risk associated with postdischarge new-onset AF in post-MI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: The population included 271 post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and no history of previous AF from the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. All patients were implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor and followed up every 3 months for 2 years. Major cardiovascular events were defined as reinfarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or death. Results: The risk of new-onset AF is highest during the first 2 months after the acute MI (16% event rate) and decreases until month 12 post-MI, after which the risk for new-onset AF is stable. The risk of major cardiovascular events was increased in patients with AF events <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 2.73 [1.35 to 5.50], P = .005), but not in patients with AF events lasting <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.35 to 3.92], P = .80). More than 90% of all recorded AF events were asymptomatic. Conclusion: Using an implantable cardiac monitor, the incidence of new-onset AF was found to be 4-fold higher than earlier reported. In the study population, in which treatment with beta-blockers was optimized, the vast majority of AF events were asymptomatic, emphasizing the importance of using continuous monitoring for studies concerning AF in heart failure patients. A duration of 30 seconds or more identified clinically important AF episodes documented by an implantable cardiac monitor.

Original language	English
Journal	Heart Rhythm
Volume	8
Issue number	3
Pages (from-to)	342-8
Number of pages	7
ISSN	1547-5271
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2011

Access to Document

10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

Cite this

Jons, C., Jacobsen, U. G., Joergensen, R. M., Olsen, N. T., Dixen, U., Johannessen, A., Huikuri, H., Messier, M., McNitt, S., Thomsen, P. E. B., & Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction study group (2011). The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy. Heart Rhythm, 8(3), 342-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy. / Jons, Christian; Jacobsen, Uffe G; Joergensen, Rikke Moerch et al.

In: Heart Rhythm, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 342-8.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Jons, C, Jacobsen, UG, Joergensen, RM, Olsen, NT, Dixen, U, Johannessen, A, Huikuri, H, Messier, M, McNitt, S, Thomsen, PEB & Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction study group 2011, 'The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy', Heart Rhythm, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 342-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

@article{57d72e1a9c8f417cb78a0f4980626d36,

title = "The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy",

abstract = "Background: The incidence and risk associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Objective: This study sought to describe the incidence and clinical risk associated with postdischarge new-onset AF in post-MI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: The population included 271 post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and no history of previous AF from the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. All patients were implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor and followed up every 3 months for 2 years. Major cardiovascular events were defined as reinfarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or death. Results: The risk of new-onset AF is highest during the first 2 months after the acute MI (16% event rate) and decreases until month 12 post-MI, after which the risk for new-onset AF is stable. The risk of major cardiovascular events was increased in patients with AF events <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 2.73 [1.35 to 5.50], P = .005), but not in patients with AF events lasting <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.35 to 3.92], P = .80). More than 90% of all recorded AF events were asymptomatic. Conclusion: Using an implantable cardiac monitor, the incidence of new-onset AF was found to be 4-fold higher than earlier reported. In the study population, in which treatment with beta-blockers was optimized, the vast majority of AF events were asymptomatic, emphasizing the importance of using continuous monitoring for studies concerning AF in heart failure patients. A duration of 30 seconds or more identified clinically important AF episodes documented by an implantable cardiac monitor.",

author = "Christian Jons and Jacobsen, {Uffe G} and Joergensen, {Rikke Moerch} and Olsen, {Niels Thue} and Ulrik Dixen and Arne Johannessen and Heikki Huikuri and Marc Messier and Scott McNitt and Thomsen, {Poul Erik Bloch} and Thomsen, {P.E. Bloch}",

note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2011",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "342--8",

journal = "Heart Rhythm",

issn = "1547-5271",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy

AU - Jons, Christian

AU - Jacobsen, Uffe G

AU - Joergensen, Rikke Moerch

AU - Olsen, Niels Thue

AU - Dixen, Ulrik

AU - Johannessen, Arne

AU - Huikuri, Heikki

AU - Messier, Marc

AU - McNitt, Scott

AU - Thomsen, Poul Erik Bloch

AU - Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction study group

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Background: The incidence and risk associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Objective: This study sought to describe the incidence and clinical risk associated with postdischarge new-onset AF in post-MI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: The population included 271 post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and no history of previous AF from the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. All patients were implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor and followed up every 3 months for 2 years. Major cardiovascular events were defined as reinfarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or death. Results: The risk of new-onset AF is highest during the first 2 months after the acute MI (16% event rate) and decreases until month 12 post-MI, after which the risk for new-onset AF is stable. The risk of major cardiovascular events was increased in patients with AF events <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 2.73 [1.35 to 5.50], P = .005), but not in patients with AF events lasting <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.35 to 3.92], P = .80). More than 90% of all recorded AF events were asymptomatic. Conclusion: Using an implantable cardiac monitor, the incidence of new-onset AF was found to be 4-fold higher than earlier reported. In the study population, in which treatment with beta-blockers was optimized, the vast majority of AF events were asymptomatic, emphasizing the importance of using continuous monitoring for studies concerning AF in heart failure patients. A duration of 30 seconds or more identified clinically important AF episodes documented by an implantable cardiac monitor.

AB - Background: The incidence and risk associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains unknown. Objective: This study sought to describe the incidence and clinical risk associated with postdischarge new-onset AF in post-MI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: The population included 271 post-MI patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and no history of previous AF from the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. All patients were implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor and followed up every 3 months for 2 years. Major cardiovascular events were defined as reinfarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or death. Results: The risk of new-onset AF is highest during the first 2 months after the acute MI (16% event rate) and decreases until month 12 post-MI, after which the risk for new-onset AF is stable. The risk of major cardiovascular events was increased in patients with AF events <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 2.73 [1.35 to 5.50], P = .005), but not in patients with AF events lasting <30 seconds (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.35 to 3.92], P = .80). More than 90% of all recorded AF events were asymptomatic. Conclusion: Using an implantable cardiac monitor, the incidence of new-onset AF was found to be 4-fold higher than earlier reported. In the study population, in which treatment with beta-blockers was optimized, the vast majority of AF events were asymptomatic, emphasizing the importance of using continuous monitoring for studies concerning AF in heart failure patients. A duration of 30 seconds or more identified clinically important AF episodes documented by an implantable cardiac monitor.

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21093611

SN - 1547-5271

VL - 8

SP - 342

EP - 348

JO - Heart Rhythm

JF - Heart Rhythm

IS - 3

ER -

The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this