The importance of independent chronology in integrating records of past climate change for the 60–8 ka INTIMATE time interval

Achim Brauer, Irka Hajdas, Simon P.E. Blockley, Christopher B. Ramsey, Marcus Christi, Susan Ivy-Ochs, Gina E. Moseley, Norbert N. Nowaczyk, Sune Olander Rasmussen, Helen M. Roberts, Christoph Spötl, Richard A. Staff, Anders Svensson

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides a brief overview of the most common dating techniques applied in palaeoclimate and palaeoenvironmental studies including four radiometric and isotopic dating methods (radiocarbon, 230Th disequilibrium, luminescence, cosmogenic nuclides) and two incremental methods based on layer counting (ice layer, varves). For each method, concise background information about the fundamental principles and methodological approaches is provided. We concentrate on the time interval of focus for the INTIMATE (Integrating Ice core, MArine and TErrestrial records) community (60-8ka). This dating guide addresses palaeoclimatologists who aim at interpretation of their often regional and local proxy time series in a wider spatial context and, therefore, have to rely on correlation with proxy records obtained from different archives from various regions. For this reason, we especially emphasise scientific approaches for harmonising chronologies for sophisticated and robust proxy data integration. In this respect, up-to-date age modelling techniques are presented as well as tools for linking records by age equivalence including tephrochronology, cosmogenic 10Be and palaeomagnetic variations. Finally, to avoid inadequate documentation of chronologies and assure reliable correlation of proxy time series, this paper provides recommendations for minimum standards of uncertainty and age datum reporting.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuaternary Science Reviews
Volume106
Pages (from-to)47-66
ISSN0277-3791
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of independent chronology in integrating records of past climate change for the 60–8 ka INTIMATE time interval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this