The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in Internatoinal Courts

Henrik Palmer Olsen

doi:10.1163/15718123-01405010

The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in Internatoinal Courts

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ninety per cent of international courts' (ICs) legal decisions have been issued within the last two decades. This increase in case law - along with other significant changes in the operation of ICs - signals a new form of judicialised international law. This change is best described as a shift from a 'static' regime of contractual relations between sovereign states to a more 'organic' regime of 'living law'. In criminal law, this development is exemplified by the reasoning of the ICTY, the ICTR and the ICC. In examining the institutional undercurrents that accompany these changes important questions arise: through what social processes is legitimacy imputed to ICs? How do ICs handle or avoid crises in legitimacy? In the context of recent critiques of judicial reasoning in international criminal law, the article suggests that the analysis of case law from ICs must become as dynamic and agile as contemporary international law itself.

Original language	English
Journal	International Criminal Law Review
Volume	14
Issue number	4-5
Pages (from-to)	920-943
Number of pages	24
ISSN	1567-536X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01405010
Publication status	Published - 31 Jul 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1163/15718123-01405010

Cite this

@article{6cb16429bcdf4f4ab9aff48ec58d98d6,

title = "The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in Internatoinal Courts",

abstract = "Ninety per cent of international courts' (ICs) legal decisions have been issued within the last two decades. This increase in case law - along with other significant changes in the operation of ICs - signals a new form of judicialised international law. This change is best described as a shift from a 'static' regime of contractual relations between sovereign states to a more 'organic' regime of 'living law'. In criminal law, this development is exemplified by the reasoning of the ICTY, the ICTR and the ICC. In examining the institutional undercurrents that accompany these changes important questions arise: through what social processes is legitimacy imputed to ICs? How do ICs handle or avoid crises in legitimacy? In the context of recent critiques of judicial reasoning in international criminal law, the article suggests that the analysis of case law from ICs must become as dynamic and agile as contemporary international law itself.",

author = "Olsen, {Henrik Palmer}",

year = "2014",

month = jul,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1163/15718123-01405010",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "920--943",

journal = "International Criminal Law Review",

issn = "1567-536X",

publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",

number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The End of an Era

T2 - Static and Dynamic Interpretation in Internatoinal Courts

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

PY - 2014/7/31

Y1 - 2014/7/31

N2 - Ninety per cent of international courts' (ICs) legal decisions have been issued within the last two decades. This increase in case law - along with other significant changes in the operation of ICs - signals a new form of judicialised international law. This change is best described as a shift from a 'static' regime of contractual relations between sovereign states to a more 'organic' regime of 'living law'. In criminal law, this development is exemplified by the reasoning of the ICTY, the ICTR and the ICC. In examining the institutional undercurrents that accompany these changes important questions arise: through what social processes is legitimacy imputed to ICs? How do ICs handle or avoid crises in legitimacy? In the context of recent critiques of judicial reasoning in international criminal law, the article suggests that the analysis of case law from ICs must become as dynamic and agile as contemporary international law itself.

AB - Ninety per cent of international courts' (ICs) legal decisions have been issued within the last two decades. This increase in case law - along with other significant changes in the operation of ICs - signals a new form of judicialised international law. This change is best described as a shift from a 'static' regime of contractual relations between sovereign states to a more 'organic' regime of 'living law'. In criminal law, this development is exemplified by the reasoning of the ICTY, the ICTR and the ICC. In examining the institutional undercurrents that accompany these changes important questions arise: through what social processes is legitimacy imputed to ICs? How do ICs handle or avoid crises in legitimacy? In the context of recent critiques of judicial reasoning in international criminal law, the article suggests that the analysis of case law from ICs must become as dynamic and agile as contemporary international law itself.

U2 - 10.1163/15718123-01405010

DO - 10.1163/15718123-01405010

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1567-536X

VL - 14

SP - 920

EP - 943

JO - International Criminal Law Review

JF - International Criminal Law Review

IS - 4-5

ER -

The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in Internatoinal Courts

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this