TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of height and BMI on prostate cancer incidence and mortality
T2 - a Mendelian randomization study in 20,848 cases and 20,214 controls from the PRACTICAL consortium
AU - Davies, Neil M
AU - Gaunt, Tom R
AU - Lewis, Sarah J
AU - Holly, Jeff
AU - Donovan, Jenny L
AU - Hamdy, Freddie C
AU - Kemp, John P
AU - Eeles, Rosalind
AU - Easton, Doug
AU - Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
AU - Al Olama, Ali Amin
AU - Benlloch, Sara
AU - Muir, Kenneth
AU - Giles, Graham G
AU - Wiklund, Fredrik
AU - Gronberg, Henrik
AU - Haiman, Christopher A
AU - Schleutker, Johanna
AU - Nordestgaard, Børge G
AU - Travis, Ruth C
AU - Neal, David
AU - Pashayan, Nora
AU - Khaw, Kay-Tee
AU - Stanford, Janet L
AU - Blot, William J
AU - Thibodeau, Stephen
AU - Maier, Christiane
AU - Kibel, Adam S
AU - Cybulski, Cezary
AU - Cannon-Albright, Lisa
AU - Brenner, Hermann
AU - Park, Jong
AU - Kaneva, Radka
AU - Batra, Jyotsna
AU - Teixeira, Manuel R
AU - Pandha, Hardev
AU - Lathrop, Mark
AU - Smith, George Davey
AU - Martin, Richard M
AU - PRACTICAL consortium
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Background: Epidemiological studies suggest a potential role for obesity and determinants of adult stature in prostate cancer risk and mortality, but the relationships described in the literature are complex. To address uncertainty over the causal nature of previous observational findings, we investigated associations of height- and adiposity-related genetic variants with prostate cancer risk and mortality. Methods: We conducted a case–control study based on 20,848 prostate cancers and 20,214 controls of European ancestry from 22 studies in the PRACTICAL consortium. We constructed genetic risk scores that summed each man’s number of height and BMI increasing alleles across multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms robustly associated with each phenotype from published genome-wide association studies. Results: The genetic risk scores explained 6.31 and 1.46 % of the variability in height and BMI, respectively. There was only weak evidence that genetic variants previously associated with increased BMI were associated with a lower prostate cancer risk (odds ratio per standard deviation increase in BMI genetic score 0.98; 95 % CI 0.96, 1.00; p = 0.07). Genetic variants associated with increased height were not associated with prostate cancer incidence (OR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.97, 1.01; p = 0.23), but were associated with an increase (OR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.08, 1.20) in prostate cancer mortality among low-grade disease (p heterogeneity, low vs. high grade <0.001). Genetic variants associated with increased BMI were associated with an increase (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.14) in all-cause mortality among men with low-grade disease (p heterogeneity = 0.03). Conclusions: We found little evidence of a substantial effect of genetically elevated height or BMI on prostate cancer risk, suggesting that previously reported observational associations may reflect common environmental determinants of height or BMI and prostate cancer risk. Genetically elevated height and BMI were associated with increased mortality (prostate cancer-specific and all-cause, respectively) in men with low-grade disease, a potentially informative but novel finding that requires replication.
AB - Background: Epidemiological studies suggest a potential role for obesity and determinants of adult stature in prostate cancer risk and mortality, but the relationships described in the literature are complex. To address uncertainty over the causal nature of previous observational findings, we investigated associations of height- and adiposity-related genetic variants with prostate cancer risk and mortality. Methods: We conducted a case–control study based on 20,848 prostate cancers and 20,214 controls of European ancestry from 22 studies in the PRACTICAL consortium. We constructed genetic risk scores that summed each man’s number of height and BMI increasing alleles across multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms robustly associated with each phenotype from published genome-wide association studies. Results: The genetic risk scores explained 6.31 and 1.46 % of the variability in height and BMI, respectively. There was only weak evidence that genetic variants previously associated with increased BMI were associated with a lower prostate cancer risk (odds ratio per standard deviation increase in BMI genetic score 0.98; 95 % CI 0.96, 1.00; p = 0.07). Genetic variants associated with increased height were not associated with prostate cancer incidence (OR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.97, 1.01; p = 0.23), but were associated with an increase (OR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.08, 1.20) in prostate cancer mortality among low-grade disease (p heterogeneity, low vs. high grade <0.001). Genetic variants associated with increased BMI were associated with an increase (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.14) in all-cause mortality among men with low-grade disease (p heterogeneity = 0.03). Conclusions: We found little evidence of a substantial effect of genetically elevated height or BMI on prostate cancer risk, suggesting that previously reported observational associations may reflect common environmental determinants of height or BMI and prostate cancer risk. Genetically elevated height and BMI were associated with increased mortality (prostate cancer-specific and all-cause, respectively) in men with low-grade disease, a potentially informative but novel finding that requires replication.
U2 - 10.1007/s10552-015-0654-9
DO - 10.1007/s10552-015-0654-9
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26387087
SN - 0957-5243
VL - 26
SP - 1603
EP - 1616
JO - Cancer Causes & Control
JF - Cancer Causes & Control
IS - 11
ER -