Testosterone deficiency in testicular cancer survivors - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mikkel Bandak, N Jørgensen, A. Juul, I R Vogelius, J Lauritsen, M G Kier, M S Mortensen, P Glovinski, G Daugaard

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results concerning treatment of Testicular Germ Cell Cancer (TGCC) and subsequent risk of testosterone deficiency are conflicting. To systematically evaluate and estimate the risk of testosterone deficiency (TD) in TGCC-patients according to treatment to optimize follow-up and for prevention of late effects related to hypogonadism. We performed a critical review of PubMed in January 2015 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Twelve publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. Eleven studies evaluated the risk of TD in TGCC-patients treated with standard chemotherapy (CT) and the odds ratio for TD was 1.8 (95% CI) (1.3-2.5), (p = 0.0007). Seven studies evaluated the risk of TD in TGCC-patients treated with non-conventional therapy and the odds ratio for TD was 3.1 (95% CI) (2.0-4.8), (p < 0.0001). Six studies evaluated the risk of TD in TGCC-patients treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy (RT), and the odds ratio for TD was 1.6 (95% CI) (1.0-2.4), (p = 0.03). In all treatment groups the risk of TD was compared with TGCC-patients treated with orchiectomy alone. There was no indication of heterogeneity between studies in the three treatment groups. Strong evidence exists that standard CT, non-conventional therapy and infradiaphragmatic RT are associated with an increased risk of TD in TGCC-patients when compared with orchiectomy alone. The risk of testosterone defficiency appears to be highest in patients treated with non-conventional therapy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAndrology
Volume4
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)382-388
Number of pages7
ISSN2047-2919
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testosterone deficiency in testicular cancer survivors - a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this