TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeting either GH or IGF-I during somatostatin analogue treatment in patients with acromegaly
T2 - A randomized multicentre study
AU - Dal, Jakob
AU - Klose, Marianne
AU - Heck, Ansgar
AU - Andersen, Marianne
AU - Kistorp, Caroline
AU - Nielsen, Eigil H.
AU - Bollerslev, Jens
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
AU - Jørgensen, Jens O.L.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Context: Discordant GH and IGF-I values are frequent in acromegaly. The clinical signifcance and its dependence on treatment modality and of glucose-suppressed GH (GHnadir) measurements remain uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effects of targeting either IGF-I or GH during somatostatin analogue (SA) treatment. Patients and Methods: 84 patients with controlled acromegaly after surgery (n = 23) or SA (n = 61) underwent a GH profle including an OGTT, at baseline and after 12 months. SA patients were randomized to monitoring according to either IGF-I (n = 33) or GHnadir (n = 28). SA dose escalation was allowed at baseline and 6 months. Main outcome measures: GHnadir and IGF-I at baseline and 12 months, and disease-specifc Quality of Life (QoL). Results: IGF-I and fasting GH levels were comparable between the surgery and the SA group, whereas GHnadir (μ g/L) was lower in the surgery group (GHnadir 0.7 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1, P < 0.01). SA dose increase was performed in 20 patients in the GH group and in 8 patients in the IGF-I group (P = 0.02), which increased the number of concordantly controlled patients (P = 0.01). QoL was only mildly affected at baseline in all groups and did not changed consistently during the study. Conclusion: (1) Discordant values in terms of high GH levels are prevalent in SA patients and more so if applying glucose-suppressed GHnadir; (2) targeting discordant levels of either GH or IGF-I translates into SA dose increase and improved biochemical control; (3) even though QoL was not improved in this study, we suggest biochemical assessment of disease activity to include glucose-suppressed GHnadir also in SA patients.
AB - Context: Discordant GH and IGF-I values are frequent in acromegaly. The clinical signifcance and its dependence on treatment modality and of glucose-suppressed GH (GHnadir) measurements remain uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the effects of targeting either IGF-I or GH during somatostatin analogue (SA) treatment. Patients and Methods: 84 patients with controlled acromegaly after surgery (n = 23) or SA (n = 61) underwent a GH profle including an OGTT, at baseline and after 12 months. SA patients were randomized to monitoring according to either IGF-I (n = 33) or GHnadir (n = 28). SA dose escalation was allowed at baseline and 6 months. Main outcome measures: GHnadir and IGF-I at baseline and 12 months, and disease-specifc Quality of Life (QoL). Results: IGF-I and fasting GH levels were comparable between the surgery and the SA group, whereas GHnadir (μ g/L) was lower in the surgery group (GHnadir 0.7 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1, P < 0.01). SA dose increase was performed in 20 patients in the GH group and in 8 patients in the IGF-I group (P = 0.02), which increased the number of concordantly controlled patients (P = 0.01). QoL was only mildly affected at baseline in all groups and did not changed consistently during the study. Conclusion: (1) Discordant values in terms of high GH levels are prevalent in SA patients and more so if applying glucose-suppressed GHnadir; (2) targeting discordant levels of either GH or IGF-I translates into SA dose increase and improved biochemical control; (3) even though QoL was not improved in this study, we suggest biochemical assessment of disease activity to include glucose-suppressed GHnadir also in SA patients.
U2 - 10.1530/eje-17-0546
DO - 10.1530/eje-17-0546
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28993415
AN - SCOPUS:85037675462
SN - 0804-4643
VL - 178
SP - 65
EP - 74
JO - European Journal of Endocrinology
JF - European Journal of Endocrinology
IS - 1
ER -