Statistical mechanics and the description of the early universe II. Principle of detailed balance and primordial 4He formation

Martin Elias Pessah, Diego F. Torres

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If the universe is slightly non-extensive, and the distribution functions are not exactly given by those of Boltzmann-Gibbs, the primordial production of light elements will be non-trivially modified. In particular, the principle of detailed balance (PDB), of fundamental importance in the standard analytical analysis, is no longer valid, and a non-extensive correction appears. This correction is computed and its influence is studied and compared with previous works, where, even when the universe was considered as an slightly non-extensive system, the PDB was assumed valid. We analytically track the formation of Helium and Deuterium, and study the kind of deviation one could expect from the standard regime. The correction to the capture time, the moment in which Deuterium can no longer be substantially photo-disintegrated, is also presented. This allows us to take into account the process of the free decay of neutrons, which was absent in all previous treatments of the topic. We show that even when considering a first (linear) order correction in the quantum distribution functions, the final output on the primordial nucleosynthesis yields cannot be reduced to a linear correction in the abundances. We finally obtain new bounds upon the non-extensive parameter, both comparing the range of physical viability of the theory, and using the latest observational data.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Volume297
Issue number1-2
Pages (from-to)201-228
Number of pages27
ISSN0378-4371
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2001

Keywords

  • gr-qc
  • astro-ph
  • cond-mat.stat-mech

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical mechanics and the description of the early universe II. Principle of detailed balance and primordial 4He formation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this