State or nature? Endogenous formal versus informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods

Kenju Kamei; Louis Putterman; Jean-Robert Karl Tyran

doi:10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0

State or nature? Endogenous formal versus informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods

Kenju Kamei, Louis Putterman, Jean-Robert Karl Tyran

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate the endogenous formation of sanctioning institutions supposed to improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. Our paper parallels Markussen et al. (Rev Econ Stud 81:301–324, 2014) in that our experimental subjects vote over formal versus informal sanctions, but it goes beyond that paper by endogenizing the formal sanction scheme. We find that self-determined formal sanctions schemes are popular and efficient when they carry no up-front cost, but as in Markussen et al. informal sanctions are more popular and efficient than formal sanctions when adopting the latter entails such a cost. Practice improves the performance of sanction schemes: they become more targeted and deterrent with learning. Voters’ characteristics, including their tendency to engage in perverse informal sanctioning, help to predict individual voting.

Original language	English
Journal	Experimental Economics
Volume	18
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	38-65
Number of pages	28
ISSN	1386-4157
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0
Publication status	Published - Mar 2015

Access to Document

10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0

Cite this

@article{99952e2bfdd74d3ca91e2d90fdedb7e3,

title = "State or nature? Endogenous formal versus informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods",

abstract = "We investigate the endogenous formation of sanctioning institutions supposed to improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. Our paper parallels Markussen et al. (Rev Econ Stud 81:301–324, 2014) in that our experimental subjects vote over formal versus informal sanctions, but it goes beyond that paper by endogenizing the formal sanction scheme. We find that self-determined formal sanctions schemes are popular and efficient when they carry no up-front cost, but as in Markussen et al. informal sanctions are more popular and efficient than formal sanctions when adopting the latter entails such a cost. Practice improves the performance of sanction schemes: they become more targeted and deterrent with learning. Voters{\textquoteright} characteristics, including their tendency to engage in perverse informal sanctioning, help to predict individual voting.",

author = "Kenju Kamei and Louis Putterman and Tyran, {Jean-Robert Karl}",

note = "JEL Classification: C92, C91, D03, D71, H4",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "38--65",

journal = "Experimental Economics",

issn = "1386-4157",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State or nature? Endogenous formal versus informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods

AU - Kamei, Kenju

AU - Putterman, Louis

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert Karl

N1 - JEL Classification: C92, C91, D03, D71, H4

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - We investigate the endogenous formation of sanctioning institutions supposed to improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. Our paper parallels Markussen et al. (Rev Econ Stud 81:301–324, 2014) in that our experimental subjects vote over formal versus informal sanctions, but it goes beyond that paper by endogenizing the formal sanction scheme. We find that self-determined formal sanctions schemes are popular and efficient when they carry no up-front cost, but as in Markussen et al. informal sanctions are more popular and efficient than formal sanctions when adopting the latter entails such a cost. Practice improves the performance of sanction schemes: they become more targeted and deterrent with learning. Voters’ characteristics, including their tendency to engage in perverse informal sanctioning, help to predict individual voting.

AB - We investigate the endogenous formation of sanctioning institutions supposed to improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. Our paper parallels Markussen et al. (Rev Econ Stud 81:301–324, 2014) in that our experimental subjects vote over formal versus informal sanctions, but it goes beyond that paper by endogenizing the formal sanction scheme. We find that self-determined formal sanctions schemes are popular and efficient when they carry no up-front cost, but as in Markussen et al. informal sanctions are more popular and efficient than formal sanctions when adopting the latter entails such a cost. Practice improves the performance of sanction schemes: they become more targeted and deterrent with learning. Voters’ characteristics, including their tendency to engage in perverse informal sanctioning, help to predict individual voting.

U2 - 10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0

DO - 10.1007/s10683-014-9405-0

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1386-4157

VL - 18

SP - 38

EP - 65

JO - Experimental Economics

JF - Experimental Economics

IS - 1

ER -

State or nature? Endogenous formal versus informal sanctions in the voluntary provision of public goods

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this