Secondary recurrent miscarriage and H-Y immunity

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Approximately half recurrent miscarriage (RM) cases remain unexplained after standard investigations. Secondary RM (SRM) is, in contrast to primary RM, preceded by a birth, which increases the transfer of fetal cells into the maternal circulation. Mothers of boys are often immunized against male-specific minor histocompatibility (H-Y) antigens, and H-Y immunity can cause graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation. We proposed the H-Y hypothesis that aberrant H-Y immunity is a causal factor for SRM. METHODS This is a critical review of the H-Y hypothesis based on own publications and papers identified by systematic PubMed and EMBASE searches. RESULTS SRM is more common after the birth of a boy and the subsequent live birth rate is reduced for SRM patients with a firstborn boy. The male:female ratio of children born prior and subsequent to SRM is 1.49 and 0.76 respectively. Maternal carriage of HLA-class II alleles presenting H-Y antigens to immune cells is associated with a reduced live birth rate and increased risk of obstetric complications in surviving pregnancies in SRM patients with a firstborn boy. In early pregnancy, both antibodies against HLA and H-Y antigens are increased in SRM patients compared with controls. Presence of these antibodies in early pregnancy is associated with a lower live birth rate and a low male:female ratio in subsequent live births, respectively. Births of boys are also associated with subsequent obstetric complications in the background population. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiological, immunogenetic and immunological studies support the hypothesis that aberrant maternal H-Y immune responses have a pathogenic role in SRM.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Reproduction Update
Volume17
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)558-74
Number of pages17
ISSN1355-4786
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary recurrent miscarriage and H-Y immunity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this