Salivary microbial profiles in 5-year old children with oral clefts: a comparative study

A L Sundell, C Ullbro, G Dahlén, A Marcusson, S Twetman

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To compare the salivary microbial profile in children with oral clefts to matched non-cleft controls in a cross-sectional study. Methods: The cleft group consisted of 80 children aged 5 years and 144 age-matched non-cleft children were recruited as a control group. Stimulated whole saliva samples were collected and analysed with checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridisation using 12 pre-determined bacterial probes. Background data on caries, oral hygiene, dietary habits and fluoride exposure were collected from clinical examinations and questionnaires. Results: Children in the cleft group had a significantly higher prevalence of dental caries but only minor differences in the salivary microbial profile were found. In general, the cleft-children displayed a lower prevalence of common commensal species (e.g. Streptococcus, Fusobacterium) when compared with the non-cleft controls. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) but the clinical significance was unclear. Conclusions: The profile of the salivary microflora in 5-year-old children with and without oral clefts was basically similar and displayed only marginal differences with respect to commensal bacteria.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry
Volume19
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)57-60
Number of pages4
ISSN1818-6300
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Child, Preschool
  • Cleft Lip/complications
  • Cleft Palate/complications
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dental Caries/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Saliva/microbiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Salivary microbial profiles in 5-year old children with oral clefts: a comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this