Rituximab and dexamethasone vs dexamethasone monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Sif Gudbrandsdottir, Henrik Sverre Birgens, Henrik Frederiksen, Bjarne Anker Jensen, Morten Krogh Jensen, Lars Kjeldsen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen, Herdis Larsen, Hans Torben Mourits-Andersen, Claus Henrik Nielsen, Ove Juul Nielsen, Torben Plesner, Stanislaw Pulczynski, Inge Helleberg Rasmussen, Dorthe Rønnov-Jessen, Hans Carl Hasselbalch

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we report the results from the largest cohort to date of newly diagnosed adult immune thrombocytopenia patients randomized to treatment with dexamethasone alone or in combination with rituximab. Eligible were patients with platelet counts ≤25x109/L or ≤50x109/L with bleeding symptoms. A total of 133 patients were randomly assigned to either dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days (n = 71) or in combination with rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks (n = 62). Patients were allowed supplemental dexamethasone every 1 to 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Our primary end point, sustained response (ie platelets ≥50x109/L) at 6 months follow-up was reached in 58% of patients in the rituximab 1 dexamethasone group vs 37% in the dexamethasone group (P = .02). The median follow-up time was 922 days. We found longer time to relapse (P = .03) and longer time to rescue treatment (P = .007) in the rituximab 1 dexamethasone group. There was an increased incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the rituximab 1 dexamethasone group (P = .04). In conclusion, rituximab 1 dexamethasone induced higher response rates and longer time to relapse than dexamethasone alone. This study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00909077.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBlood
Volume121
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1976-81
Number of pages6
ISSN0006-4971
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rituximab and dexamethasone vs dexamethasone monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this