Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up

Claus Lindkær Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Gunnar Flivik; Bjarne Lund

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up

Claus Lindkær Jensen, Michael M Petersen, Henrik M Schrøder, Gunnar Flivik, Bjarne Lund

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

"Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume	27
Issue number	10
Pages (from-to)	1820-1826.e2
ISSN	0883-5403
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036
Publication status	Published - Dec 2012

Access to Document

10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036

Cite this

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones : a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. / Jensen, Claus Lindkær; Petersen, Michael M; Schrøder, Henrik M et al.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 27, No. 10, 12.2012, p. 1820-1826.e2.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

@article{b1d4e675cb894a349de89b65f56c683a,

title = "Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up",

abstract = "{"}Trabecular Metal Cone{"} (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.",

author = "Jensen, {Claus Lindk{\ae}r} and Petersen, {Michael M} and Schr{\o}der, {Henrik M} and Gunnar Flivik and Bjarne Lund",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "1820--1826.e2",

journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",

issn = "0883-5403",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones

T2 - a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up

AU - Jensen, Claus Lindkær

AU - Petersen, Michael M

AU - Schrøder, Henrik M

AU - Flivik, Gunnar

AU - Lund, Bjarne

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - "Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.

AB - "Trabecular Metal Cone" (TM Cone) (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Ind) for reconstruction of bone loss in the proximal tibia during revision total knee arthroplasty is now optional. Forty patients were randomized to receive revision total knee arthroplasty with or without TM Cone (No TM Cone). The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute bone loss classification and NexGen revision system were used. Radiostereometric analysis was performed with 24 months of follow-up. Maximum total point motion: stable migration was seen in the TM Cone group. No statistically significant difference was found. Segment motion analysis at 24 months showed the same net direction of rotation for the groups around the y-, z-axis and around the x-, y-axis for translation. Tibial revision implants with TM Cone result in an early stable situation with less irregular migration pattern than revision without TM Cone.

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22795879

SN - 0883-5403

VL - 27

SP - 1820-1826.e2

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

IS - 10

ER -

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this