Rethinking access: how humanitarian technology governance blurs control and care

Katja Lindskov Jacobsen*, Larissa Fast

*Corresponding author for this work
    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Surprisingly little attention is paid to the role of digital technology and related forms of data production, storage, processing, and sharing in humanitarian governance. This paper uses Michael Barnett's () conceptualisation of humanitarian governance when arguing for a better accounting of technology in literature on humanitarian governance. Specifically, it proposes a two-fold alertness to governance of (a) the uses of new technology and (b) that which is produced by digital technologies. This elucidates important issues, including that of access to digitalised data collected from humanitarian subjects, with implications for their (in)security. The paper concludes by suggesting that access is no longer ‘only’ about challenges of gaining access to vulnerable populations, but also about challenges of preventing access to vulnerable digital bodies and their use for aggressive purposes. In short, access and protection acquire a new dimension and analyses of humanitarian governance must be more attentive to the role of digital technology.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalDisasters
    Volume43
    Issue numberS2
    Pages (from-to)S151-S168
    ISSN0361-3666
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

    Keywords

    • agentic capacity
    • digital technology
    • digitalised data
    • digitalised recipient bodies
    • humanitarian access
    • humanitarian technology governance
    • vile bodies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking access: how humanitarian technology governance blurs control and care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this