Abstract
When faced with a problem, policymakers have a choice of action or inaction. Psychological research shows varying results on how individuals evaluate (in)actions conditional on the subsequent outcome. I replicate, generalize, and extend this research into a public management setting with two independent experiments embedded in a nationally representative sample of Danish citizens (n = 2,007). Both experiments show that actions are evaluated more positively than inactions – regardless of the outcome. This finding runs contrary to the inaction (or omission) bias but is consistent with evidence on a “norm of action”, in response to poor performance in political–administrative settings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Public Management Review |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 9 |
Pages (from-to) | 1352-1364 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 1471-9037 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Oct 2017 |
Keywords
- Attribution
- behavioural public administration
- blame avoidance
- omission bias