Regulating certification bodies in the field of medical devices: The PIP breast implants litigation and beyond

Carola Glinski; Peter Rott

Regulating certification bodies in the field of medical devices: The PIP breast implants litigation and beyond

CEPRI - Centre for Private Governance

Abstract

This article uses the breast implants scandal around the French producer Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) to discuss the regulation of medical devices in EU law. Thereby, the specific focus is on the role of tort liability of certification bodies in complementing the public law regime of medical devices law. As tort law has not been harmonised yet at the level of EU law, national legal systems may produce different results; which indeed the PIP case demonstrates, with diverging judgments from French and German courts. Showing the deficiencies of the public law system of the Medical Devices Directive of 1993 as well as of the new Medical Devices Regulation of 2017, the article argues that tort liability is a necessary regulatory instrument to ensure that certification bodies live up to their duties under medical devices law and therefore a necessary instrument for the protection of the health and safety of patients.

Original language	English
Journal	European Review of Private Law
Volume	27
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	403-428
Number of pages	26
ISSN	0928-9801
Publication status	Published - 2019

Cite this

@article{36b351bc44b2416698e47e384176dfe8,

title = "Regulating certification bodies in the field of medical devices: The PIP breast implants litigation and beyond",

abstract = "This article uses the breast implants scandal around the French producer Poly Implant Proth{\`e}se (PIP) to discuss the regulation of medical devices in EU law. Thereby, the specific focus is on the role of tort liability of certification bodies in complementing the public law regime of medical devices law. As tort law has not been harmonised yet at the level of EU law, national legal systems may produce different results; which indeed the PIP case demonstrates, with diverging judgments from French and German courts. Showing the deficiencies of the public law system of the Medical Devices Directive of 1993 as well as of the new Medical Devices Regulation of 2017, the article argues that tort liability is a necessary regulatory instrument to ensure that certification bodies live up to their duties under medical devices law and therefore a necessary instrument for the protection of the health and safety of patients.",

author = "Carola Glinski and Peter Rott",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "403--428",

journal = "European Review of Private Law",

issn = "0928-9801",

publisher = "Kluwer Law International",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating certification bodies in the field of medical devices: The PIP breast implants litigation and beyond

AU - Glinski, Carola

AU - Rott, Peter

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article uses the breast implants scandal around the French producer Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) to discuss the regulation of medical devices in EU law. Thereby, the specific focus is on the role of tort liability of certification bodies in complementing the public law regime of medical devices law. As tort law has not been harmonised yet at the level of EU law, national legal systems may produce different results; which indeed the PIP case demonstrates, with diverging judgments from French and German courts. Showing the deficiencies of the public law system of the Medical Devices Directive of 1993 as well as of the new Medical Devices Regulation of 2017, the article argues that tort liability is a necessary regulatory instrument to ensure that certification bodies live up to their duties under medical devices law and therefore a necessary instrument for the protection of the health and safety of patients.

AB - This article uses the breast implants scandal around the French producer Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) to discuss the regulation of medical devices in EU law. Thereby, the specific focus is on the role of tort liability of certification bodies in complementing the public law regime of medical devices law. As tort law has not been harmonised yet at the level of EU law, national legal systems may produce different results; which indeed the PIP case demonstrates, with diverging judgments from French and German courts. Showing the deficiencies of the public law system of the Medical Devices Directive of 1993 as well as of the new Medical Devices Regulation of 2017, the article argues that tort liability is a necessary regulatory instrument to ensure that certification bodies live up to their duties under medical devices law and therefore a necessary instrument for the protection of the health and safety of patients.

UR - http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=ERPL2019021

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0928-9801

VL - 27

SP - 403

EP - 428

JO - European Review of Private Law

JF - European Review of Private Law

IS - 2

ER -

Regulating certification bodies in the field of medical devices: The PIP breast implants litigation and beyond

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this