Psychopathology and social functioning of 42 subjects from a Danish ultra high-risk cohort

Helle Karkov Madsen*, Dorte Nordholm, Kristine Krakauer, Lasse Randers, Merete Nordentoft

*Corresponding author for this work
6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To make a thorough characterization of the co-morbidity, psychopathology and demographics in the first Danish ultra high-risk (UHR) sample. Method: Forty-two UHR subjects went through comprehensive interviews assessing their psychopathology, psychiatric disorders, substance use and family history of psychiatric disorders. Results: All UHR subjects met the criteria of at least 1 axis I diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) and met on average four diagnoses (both axis I and II), mostly within the areas of depression, anxiety and substance abuse. A total of 48% had schizotypal personality disorder and 19% had borderline personality disorder. Level of functioning was low with a mean score on the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale corresponding to "major impairment in several areas," and mean scores in the Global Functioning: Social and Role scales between "moderate impairment in social functioning" and "very serious impairment independently." Forty-seven percent were unemployed and 29% on sick leave. Fifty-five percent relied financially on public support. Conclusion: As seen in previous UHR populations, Danish UHR subjects had low function socio-economically and met criteria of several psychiatric diagnoses, suggesting that they require pharmacological and non-pharmacological psychiatric treatment as well as vocational and educational guidance and support.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
Volume12
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1181-1187
ISSN1751-7885
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Co-morbidity
  • Early psychosis
  • Gender
  • Schizophrenia
  • Ultra high risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychopathology and social functioning of 42 subjects from a Danish ultra high-risk cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this