Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Laura Martinengo, Maja Olsson, Ram Bajpai, Michael Soljak, Zee Upton, Artur Schmidtchen, Josip Car, Krister Jarbrink

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic wounds are a major public health challenge, but little is known about the true burden with studies reporting different estimates because of disparities in study designs and measurement methods. This hampers efficient resource allocation, planning, and improvement of wound care. Methods: Our study aimed to pool prevalence estimates from a global perspective by systematically carrying out searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Global Health, and PsycINFO databases for articles reporting the prevalence of chronic wounds in adults, from January 2000 to June 2018. The included publications had to define wound chronicity by duration (≥3 weeks), and/or labeling the wounds as chronic, complex, or hard-to-heal. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 11 studies analyzing chronic wounds in the general population were included in random effects meta-analyses to calculate pooled prevalence. Chronic wounds of mixed etiologies (n = 3) showed a pooled prevalence of 2.21 per 1000 population, and for chronic leg ulcers (n = 9), the prevalence was estimated at 1.51 per 1000 population. Conclusions: Our findings, aligned to previous studies reporting point prevalence of chronic wounds identified within the healthcare system, showed that the vast majority of chronic wounds in epidemiological studies are made up by chronic leg ulcers.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume29
Pages (from-to)8-15
ISSN1047-2797
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Chronic wounds
  • Complex wounds
  • Hard-to-heal ulcers
  • Meta-analysis
  • Prevalence
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this