Political structure and the limits of recognition and representation in Ghana

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political structure and the limits of recognition and representation in Ghana

AU - Stacey, Paul Austin

N1 - Article first published online: 15 DEC 2014

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Recent studies of democratization in sub-Saharan Africa often focus on government recognition granted to traditional authorities. This article examines northern Ghana, where chiefs of a minority group are denied formal recognition but pressure state officials to recognize their status as land custodians. This leads to contests and debates between state officials, chiefs and communities over whether the customary institutions have in fact been recognized for what they claim to be. The article uses episodes of contention to nuance conceptualizations of recognition as a specific relationship between actors and institutions, and as a question of government policy or choice. Recognition and non-recognition are contested in a grey zone of social constructions. Non-recognition persists as a continuation of colonial policy, state law path trajectory, and state officials' endeavours to stay out of 'traditional' affairs. However, customary rights to land are validated by the new local government institution, and chiefs use newfound positions to expand their jurisdictions. Stakeholders affirm unequal social categories underpinning different understandings of recognition. The article examines contentions that hinge on interpretations of who is recognizing and not recognizing whom, and actors' efforts to reshape and reproduce political structures.

AB - Recent studies of democratization in sub-Saharan Africa often focus on government recognition granted to traditional authorities. This article examines northern Ghana, where chiefs of a minority group are denied formal recognition but pressure state officials to recognize their status as land custodians. This leads to contests and debates between state officials, chiefs and communities over whether the customary institutions have in fact been recognized for what they claim to be. The article uses episodes of contention to nuance conceptualizations of recognition as a specific relationship between actors and institutions, and as a question of government policy or choice. Recognition and non-recognition are contested in a grey zone of social constructions. Non-recognition persists as a continuation of colonial policy, state law path trajectory, and state officials' endeavours to stay out of 'traditional' affairs. However, customary rights to land are validated by the new local government institution, and chiefs use newfound positions to expand their jurisdictions. Stakeholders affirm unequal social categories underpinning different understandings of recognition. The article examines contentions that hinge on interpretations of who is recognizing and not recognizing whom, and actors' efforts to reshape and reproduce political structures.

U2 - 10.1111/dech.12138

DO - 10.1111/dech.12138

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0012-155X

VL - 46

SP - 25

EP - 47

JO - Development and Change

JF - Development and Change

IS - 1

ER -