Phenotyping of wheat cultivars for heat tolerance using chlorophyll a fluorescence

Dew Kumari Sharma, Sven Bode Andersen, Carl-Otto Ottosen, Eva Rosenqvist

    59 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In view of the global climate change, heat stress is an increasing constraint for the productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Our aim was to identify contrasting cultivars in terms of heat tolerance by mass screening of 1274 wheat cultivars of diverse origin, based on a physiological trait, the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm). A chlorophyll fluorescence protocol was standardised and used for repeated screening with increased selection pressure with a view to identifying a set of cultivars extreme for the trait. An initial mass screening of 1274 wheat cultivars with a milder heat stress of 38°C in 300 μmolm-2s-1 for 2h with preheating at 33-35°C for 19h in 7-14 μmolm-2s -1 light showed a genetic determination of 8.5±2.7%. A heat treatment of 40C in 300molm-2s-1 for 72h in the second screening with 138 selected cultivars resulted in larger differentiation of cultivars with an increased genetic component (15.4±3.6%), which was further increased to 27.9±6.8% in the third screening with 41 contrasting cultivars. This contrasting set of cultivars was then used to compare the ability of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to detect genetic difference in heat tolerance. The identification of a set of wheat cultivars contrasting for their inherent photochemical efficiency may aid future studies to understand the genetic and physiological nature of heat stress tolerance in order to dissect quantitative traits into simpler genetic factors.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalFunctional Plant Biology
    Volume39
    Issue number11
    Pages (from-to)936-947
    Number of pages12
    ISSN1445-4408
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phenotyping of wheat cultivars for heat tolerance using chlorophyll a fluorescence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this