Permanent play facilities in school playgrounds as a determinant of children's activity

Glen Nielsen, Rachel Taylor, Sheila Williams, Jim Mann

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: To investigate whether the number of permanent playground facilities in schools infuences objectively measured physical activity. Methods: Physical activity was measured using Actical accelerometers over 2 to 5 days in 417 children (5-12 years) from 7 schools. The number of permanent play facilities likely to encourage physical activity in individuals or groups of children (eg, adventure playgrounds, swings, trees, playground markings, courts, sandpits) were counted on 2 occasions in each school. The surface area of each playground (m2) was also measured. Results: The number of permanent play facilities in schools ranged from 14 to 35 and was positively associated with all measures of activity. For each additional play facility, average accelerometry counts were 3.8% (P < .001) higher at school and 2.7% (P < .001) higher overall. Each additional play facility was also associated with 2.3% (P = .001) or 4 minutes more moderate/vigorous activity during school hours and 3.4% (P < .001) more (9 minutes) over the course of the day. School playground area did not affect activity independent of the number of permanent play facilities. Findings were consistent across age and sex groups. Conclusion: Increasing the number of permanent play facilities at schools may offer a cost-effective and sustainable option for increasing physical activity in young children.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Physical Activity & Health
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)490-496
    Number of pages7
    ISSN1543-3080
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Science
    • Physical activty
    • Children
    • Playgrounds
    • Accelerometers

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Permanent play facilities in school playgrounds as a determinant of children's activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this