Patient-reported data and the politics of meaningful data work

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome data have moved from the realm of research to center stage in efforts to provide patient-centered care. In a Danish context, health authorities are seeking to promote and standardize the use of patient-reported outcome data. This involves normative articulations of what counts as meaningful data work in a healthcare system characterized by intensified data-sourcing. Based on ethnographic material, I suggest that an assemblage of actors, both human and technological, has accomplished the articulation of meaningful data work, with patient-reported outcome as being dependent on the active application of data in clinical trajectories—in contrast to supplying data “passively” for secondary use for research or governance. This normative articulation of “Active patient-reported outcome” legitimizes the Danish patient-reported outcome assemblage by showing alignment of the concerns of patients, clinicians and health authorities. At the same time, “Active patient-reported outcome” foreshadows challenges in making data work meaningful in local practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth Informatics Journal
Volume25
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)567-576
Number of pages10
ISSN1460-4582
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported data and the politics of meaningful data work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this