Parametric inference of neuronal response latency in presence of a background signal

Massimiliano Tamborrino; Susanne Ditlevsen; Petr Lansky

doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009

Parametric inference of neuronal response latency in presence of a background signal

Massimiliano Tamborrino, Susanne Ditlevsen, Petr Lansky

Department of Mathematical Sciences

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurons are commonly characterized by spontaneous generation of action potentials (spikes), which appear without any apparent or controlled stimulation. When a stimulus is applied, the spontaneous firing may prevail and hamper identification of the effect of the stimulus. Therefore, for any rigorous analysis of evoked neuronal activity, the presence of spontaneous firing has to be taken into account. If the background signal is ignored, however small it is compared to the response activity, and however large is the delay, estimation of the response latency will be wrong, and the error will persist even when sample size is increasing. The first question is: what is the response latency to the stimulus? Answering this question becomes even more difficult if the latency is of a complex nature, for example composed of a physically implied deterministic part and a stochastic part. This scenario is considered here, where the response time is a sum of two components; the delay and the relative latency. Parametric estimators for the time delay and the response latency are derived. These estimators are evaluated on simulated data and their properties are discussed. Finally, we show that the mean of the response latency is always satisfactorily estimated, even assuming a wrong distribution for the response latency.

Original language	English
Journal	BioSystems
Volume	112
Issue number	3
Pages (from-to)	249-257
ISSN	0303-2647
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009
Publication status	Published - Jun 2013

Access to Document

10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009

Cite this

@article{4602c91d00b541b3bdff579057281a9d,

title = "Parametric inference of neuronal response latency in presence of a background signal",

abstract = "Neurons are commonly characterized by spontaneous generation of action potentials (spikes), which appear without any apparent or controlled stimulation. When a stimulus is applied, the spontaneous firing may prevail and hamper identification of the effect of the stimulus. Therefore, for any rigorous analysis of evoked neuronal activity, the presence of spontaneous firing has to be taken into account. If the background signal is ignored, however small it is compared to the response activity, and however large is the delay, estimation of the response latency will be wrong, and the error will persist even when sample size is increasing. The first question is: what is the response latency to the stimulus? Answering this question becomes even more difficult if the latency is of a complex nature, for example composed of a physically implied deterministic part and a stochastic part. This scenario is considered here, where the response time is a sum of two components; the delay and the relative latency. Parametric estimators for the time delay and the response latency are derived. These estimators are evaluated on simulated data and their properties are discussed. Finally, we show that the mean of the response latency is always satisfactorily estimated, even assuming a wrong distribution for the response latency.",

author = "Massimiliano Tamborrino and Susanne Ditlevsen and Petr Lansky",

year = "2013",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009",

language = "English",

volume = "112",

pages = "249--257",

journal = "BioSystems",

issn = "0303-2647",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parametric inference of neuronal response latency in presence of a background signal

AU - Tamborrino, Massimiliano

AU - Ditlevsen, Susanne

AU - Lansky, Petr

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Neurons are commonly characterized by spontaneous generation of action potentials (spikes), which appear without any apparent or controlled stimulation. When a stimulus is applied, the spontaneous firing may prevail and hamper identification of the effect of the stimulus. Therefore, for any rigorous analysis of evoked neuronal activity, the presence of spontaneous firing has to be taken into account. If the background signal is ignored, however small it is compared to the response activity, and however large is the delay, estimation of the response latency will be wrong, and the error will persist even when sample size is increasing. The first question is: what is the response latency to the stimulus? Answering this question becomes even more difficult if the latency is of a complex nature, for example composed of a physically implied deterministic part and a stochastic part. This scenario is considered here, where the response time is a sum of two components; the delay and the relative latency. Parametric estimators for the time delay and the response latency are derived. These estimators are evaluated on simulated data and their properties are discussed. Finally, we show that the mean of the response latency is always satisfactorily estimated, even assuming a wrong distribution for the response latency.

AB - Neurons are commonly characterized by spontaneous generation of action potentials (spikes), which appear without any apparent or controlled stimulation. When a stimulus is applied, the spontaneous firing may prevail and hamper identification of the effect of the stimulus. Therefore, for any rigorous analysis of evoked neuronal activity, the presence of spontaneous firing has to be taken into account. If the background signal is ignored, however small it is compared to the response activity, and however large is the delay, estimation of the response latency will be wrong, and the error will persist even when sample size is increasing. The first question is: what is the response latency to the stimulus? Answering this question becomes even more difficult if the latency is of a complex nature, for example composed of a physically implied deterministic part and a stochastic part. This scenario is considered here, where the response time is a sum of two components; the delay and the relative latency. Parametric estimators for the time delay and the response latency are derived. These estimators are evaluated on simulated data and their properties are discussed. Finally, we show that the mean of the response latency is always satisfactorily estimated, even assuming a wrong distribution for the response latency.

U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.01.009

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0303-2647

VL - 112

SP - 249

EP - 257

JO - BioSystems

JF - BioSystems

IS - 3

ER -