TY - JOUR
T1 - Ovarian reserve parameters
T2 - a comparison between users and non-users of hormonal contraception
AU - Bentzen, J G
AU - Forman, Julie Lyng
AU - Pinborg, Anja
AU - Lidegaard, O
AU - Larsen, E C
AU - Friis-Hansen, L
AU - Johannsen, Trine Holm
AU - Andersen, Anders Nyboe
N1 - Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - It remains controversial whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration is influenced by hormonal contraception. This study quantified the effect of hormonal contraception on both endocrine and sonographic ovarian reserve markers in 228 users and 504 non-users of hormonal contraception. On day 2-5 of the menstrual cycle or during withdrawal bleeding, blood sampling and transvaginal sonography was performed. After adjusting for age, ovarian reserve parameters were lower among users than among non-users of hormonal contraception: serum AMH concentration by 29.8% (95% CI 19.9 to 38.5%), antral follicle count (AFC) by 30.4% (95% CI 23.6 to 36.7%) and ovarian volume by 42.2% (95% CI 37.8 to 46.3%). AFC in all follicle size categories (small, 2-4 mm; intermediate, 5-7 mm; large, 8-10 mm) was lower in users than in non-users of hormonal contraception. A negatively linear association was observed between duration of hormonal-contraception use and ovarian reserve parameters. No dose-response relation was found between the dose of ethinyloestradiol and AMH or AFC. This study indicates that ovarian reserve markers are lower in women using sex steroids for contraception. Thus, AMH concentration and AFC may not retain their accuracy as predictors of ovarian reserve in women using hormonal contraception.
AB - It remains controversial whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration is influenced by hormonal contraception. This study quantified the effect of hormonal contraception on both endocrine and sonographic ovarian reserve markers in 228 users and 504 non-users of hormonal contraception. On day 2-5 of the menstrual cycle or during withdrawal bleeding, blood sampling and transvaginal sonography was performed. After adjusting for age, ovarian reserve parameters were lower among users than among non-users of hormonal contraception: serum AMH concentration by 29.8% (95% CI 19.9 to 38.5%), antral follicle count (AFC) by 30.4% (95% CI 23.6 to 36.7%) and ovarian volume by 42.2% (95% CI 37.8 to 46.3%). AFC in all follicle size categories (small, 2-4 mm; intermediate, 5-7 mm; large, 8-10 mm) was lower in users than in non-users of hormonal contraception. A negatively linear association was observed between duration of hormonal-contraception use and ovarian reserve parameters. No dose-response relation was found between the dose of ethinyloestradiol and AMH or AFC. This study indicates that ovarian reserve markers are lower in women using sex steroids for contraception. Thus, AMH concentration and AFC may not retain their accuracy as predictors of ovarian reserve in women using hormonal contraception.
U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.001
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23069740
SN - 1472-6483
VL - 25
SP - 612
EP - 619
JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
IS - 6
ER -