Optimising the effect of policy instruments: a study of farmers' decision rationales and how they match the incentives in Danish pesticide policy

Anders Branth Pedersen, Helle Ørsted Nielsen, Tove Christensen, Berit Hasler

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Economic modelling generally assumes that businesses are profit maximisers. However, behavioural economics holds that businesses pursue multiple objectives and may even sacrifice some profit. This has implications for the effectiveness of incentive-based environmental policies. Using Danish farmers as a case, this paper examines whether non-economic rationales may trump economic ones in farmer decisions, and, unlike previous research, we quantify how widespread non-economic values are compared to more economic values. Data derive from a survey (1164 responses) of Danish conventional farmers' decision rationales regarding their use of pesticides. Using cluster analysis, we show that some farmers are more economically motivated while other farmers are more focused on optimising yield and pay less attention to expenditures and crop prices. Furthermore, we find that the two groups differ in their response to policy instruments; farmers who focus on yield indicate less responsiveness to economic policy instruments. The results imply that it is important to implement a broad array of policy instruments to match different farmer rationales.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
    Volume55
    Issue number8
    Pages (from-to)1094-1110
    Number of pages17
    ISSN0964-0568
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising the effect of policy instruments: a study of farmers' decision rationales and how they match the incentives in Danish pesticide policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this