Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Natasja Kingod, Bryan Cleal, Ayo Wahlberg, Gitte Husted

    57 Citations (Scopus)
    195 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This qualitative systematic review investigated how individuals with chronic illness experience online peer-to-peer support and how their experiences influence daily life with illness. Selected studies were appraised by quality criteria focused upon research questions and study design, participant selection, methods of data collection, and methods of analysis. Four themes were identified: (a) illness-associated identity work, (b) social support and connectivity, (c) experiential knowledge sharing, and (d) collective voice and mobilization. Findings indicate that online peer-to-peer communities provide a supportive space for daily self-care related to chronic illness. Online communities provided a valued space to strengthen social ties and exchange knowledge that supported offline ties and patient–doctor relationships. Individuals used online communities to exchange experiential knowledge about everyday life with illness. This type of knowledge was perceived as extending far beyond medical care. Online communities were also used to mobilize and raise collective awareness about illness-specific concerns.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalQualitative Health Research
    Volume27
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)89-99
    Number of pages11
    ISSN1049-7323
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • chronic illness and disease
    • internet
    • social support
    • thematic analysis
    • systematic review
    • qualitative

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this