Neurocognitive functioning in compulsive buying disorder

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurocognitive functioning in compulsive buying disorder

AU - Derbyshire, Katherine L

AU - Chamberlain, Samuel R

AU - Odlaug, Brian Lawrence

AU - Schreiber, Liana Rn

AU - Grant, Jon E

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Compulsive buying (CB) is a fairly common behavioral problem estimated to affect 5.8% of the population. Although previous research has examined the clinical characteristics of CB, little research has examined whether people with CB manifest cognitive deficits. METHODS: Twenty-three non-treatment-seeking compulsive buyers (mean age, 22.3 ± 3.5; 60.9% female) and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age, 21.1 ± 3.4, 60.9% female) underwent neurocognitive assessment. We predicted that the following cognitive domains would be impaired in CB: spatial working memory (Spatial Working Memory test), response inhibition (Stop-Signal Task), cognitive flexibility (Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift task), and decision making (Cambridge Gambling Task). RESULTS: Compared with controls, individuals with CB exhibited significant impairments in response inhibition (P = .043), risk adjustment during decision making (P = .010), and spatial working memory (P = .041 total errors; P = .044 strategy scores). Deficits were of large effect size (Cohen's d, 0.6 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that individuals with CB experience problems in several distinct cognitive domains, supporting a likely neurobiological overlap between CB and other putative behavioral and substance addictions. These findings may have implications for shared treatment approaches as well as how we currently classify and understand CB.

AB - BACKGROUND: Compulsive buying (CB) is a fairly common behavioral problem estimated to affect 5.8% of the population. Although previous research has examined the clinical characteristics of CB, little research has examined whether people with CB manifest cognitive deficits. METHODS: Twenty-three non-treatment-seeking compulsive buyers (mean age, 22.3 ± 3.5; 60.9% female) and 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age, 21.1 ± 3.4, 60.9% female) underwent neurocognitive assessment. We predicted that the following cognitive domains would be impaired in CB: spatial working memory (Spatial Working Memory test), response inhibition (Stop-Signal Task), cognitive flexibility (Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift task), and decision making (Cambridge Gambling Task). RESULTS: Compared with controls, individuals with CB exhibited significant impairments in response inhibition (P = .043), risk adjustment during decision making (P = .010), and spatial working memory (P = .041 total errors; P = .044 strategy scores). Deficits were of large effect size (Cohen's d, 0.6 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that individuals with CB experience problems in several distinct cognitive domains, supporting a likely neurobiological overlap between CB and other putative behavioral and substance addictions. These findings may have implications for shared treatment approaches as well as how we currently classify and understand CB.

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24501731

SN - 1040-1237

VL - 26

SP - 57

EP - 63

JO - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

IS - 1

ER -