Neoclassical versus frontier production models? Testing for the skewness of regression residuals

Timo Kuosmanen*, Mogens Fosgerau

*Corresponding author for this work
15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The empirical literature on production and cost functions is divided into two strands. The neoclassical approach concentrates on model parameters, while the frontier approach decomposes the disturbance term to a symmetric noise term and a positively skewed inefficiency term. We propose a theoretical justification for the skewness of the inefficiency term, arguing that this skewness is the key testable hypothesis of the frontier approach. We propose to test the regression residuals for skewness in order to distinguish the two competing approaches. Our test builds directly upon the asymmetry of regression residuals and does not require any prior distributional assumptions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Economics
Volume111
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)351-367
Number of pages17
ISSN0347-0520
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Firms and production
  • Frontier estimation
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Production function
  • Productive efficiency analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neoclassical versus frontier production models? Testing for the skewness of regression residuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this