Abstract
This article addresses a pertinent challenge to Scandinavian realism which follows from the widespread perception that the fundamental philosophical premises on which the movement relies, are no longer tenable. Focusing on Alf Ross’s version of Scandinavian realism which has often been at the centre of critical attention, the author argues that his theory can survive the fall of logical positivism through an exercise of philosophical reconstruction. More specifically, he claims that it is possible to dismount Ross’s realist legal theory almost intact from its commitments to logical positivism and embed it into an alternative naturalist philosophical program that is currently very strong in contemporary philosophy. In so doing, the author applies a narrow Quinean conception of naturalism, also known as replacement naturalism, which differs from a broader inclusive conception which has been applied by other scholars in the field but which leaves the philosophical crisis of Scandinavian realism unsolved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Legal Philosophy |
| Volume | 2014 |
| Issue number | 24 |
| Pages (from-to) | 165-186 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Law
- Alf Ross
- Scandinavian realism
- naturalized epistemology
- naturalizing jurisprudence
- W.V.O. Quine