Narrating Asylum in Camp and at Court

Matilde Skov Danstrøm, Zachary Whyte

Abstract

In Denmark, as elsewhere, narratives are central to the asylum determination procedure. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, this chapter investigates the ways in which asylum seekers and asylum lawyers present and re-present asylum narratives across two contrasting narrative contexts: Danish asylum centers (“camp” to asylum seekers) and the Danish Refugee Appeals Board (“court” to asylum seekers). Distinguishing between “asylum motive” and “asylum talk”, or stories for and stories of asylum, we argue that context strongly shapes the kinds of asylum narratives that are presented and shared, but also that these kinds of narratives influence each other. We show that uncertainty, credibility and authorship are central both in the Danish asylum process and for the ways in which it is understood by the actors invested in it.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAsylum Determination in Europe : Ethnographic Perspectives
Number of pages10
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Publication date2018
Pages175-194
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Narrating Asylum in Camp and at Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this