Momentary pleasure or lasting meaning? distinguishing eudaimonic and hedonic user experiences

Elisa D. Mekler, Kasper Hornbæk

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

User experience (UX) research has expanded our notion of what makes interactive technology good, often putting hedonic aspects of use such as fun, affect, and stimulation at the center. Outside of UX, the hedonic is often contrasted to the eudaimonic, the notion of striving towards one's personal best. It remains unclear, however, what this distinction offers to UX research conceptually and empirically. We investigate a possible role for eudaimonia in UX research by empirically examining 266 reports of positive experiences with technology and analyzing its relation to established UX concepts. Compared to hedonic experiences, eudaimonic experiences were about striving towards and accomplishing personal goals through technology use. They were also characterized by increased need fulfillment, positive affect, meaning, and long-term importance. Taken together, our findings suggest that while hedonic UX is about momentary pleasures directly derived from technology use, eudaimonic UX is about meaning from need fulfilment.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - the 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Number of pages12
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publication date2016
Pages4509-4520
ISBN (Print)978-1-4503-3362-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, United States
Duration: 7 May 201612 May 2016
Conference number: 34

Conference

Conference34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Number34
LocationSan Jose Convention Center
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Jose
Period07/05/201612/05/2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Momentary pleasure or lasting meaning? distinguishing eudaimonic and hedonic user experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this