Middle Class Without a Net: Savings, Financial Fragility, and Preferences Over Social Insurance

Jacob Gerner Hariri; Amalie Sofie Jensen; David Dreyer Lassen

doi:10.1177/0010414019879718

Middle Class Without a Net: Savings, Financial Fragility, and Preferences Over Social Insurance

Jacob Gerner Hariri, Amalie Sofie Jensen, David Dreyer Lassen^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we show that it is crucial to distinguish between liquid and illiquid wealth to understand how voters form preferences toward social insurance. Many households are financially fragile despite having high incomes and wealth, because they hold little liquid savings. We hypothesize, and show empirically, that this implies that a substantial group of voters show strong support for social insurance policies despite being wealthy and having high incomes, because of their limited ability to self-insure through own savings in case of an income shock. Our empirical analysis is based on a novel dataset from Denmark, which combines administrative data with high-quality measures of individual financial assets and survey measures of political preferences. Using data for other countries from the European Social Survey, we find evidence that our results hold more generally and are not specific to the Danish context.

Original language	English
Journal	Comparative Political Studies
ISSN	0010-4140
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879718
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2020

Keywords

political economy
public opinion
social welfare programs

Access to Document

10.1177/0010414019879718

Cite this

@article{f93e11a730a140348ea0daf1b14a8c3e,

title = "Middle Class Without a Net: Savings, Financial Fragility, and Preferences Over Social Insurance",

abstract = "In this article, we show that it is crucial to distinguish between liquid and illiquid wealth to understand how voters form preferences toward social insurance. Many households are financially fragile despite having high incomes and wealth, because they hold little liquid savings. We hypothesize, and show empirically, that this implies that a substantial group of voters show strong support for social insurance policies despite being wealthy and having high incomes, because of their limited ability to self-insure through own savings in case of an income shock. Our empirical analysis is based on a novel dataset from Denmark, which combines administrative data with high-quality measures of individual financial assets and survey measures of political preferences. Using data for other countries from the European Social Survey, we find evidence that our results hold more generally and are not specific to the Danish context.",

keywords = "political economy, public opinion, social welfare programs",

author = "Hariri, {Jacob Gerner} and Jensen, {Amalie Sofie} and Lassen, {David Dreyer}",

year = "2020",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0010414019879718",

language = "English",

journal = "Comparative Political Studies",

issn = "0010-4140",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Middle Class Without a Net

T2 - Savings, Financial Fragility, and Preferences Over Social Insurance

AU - Hariri, Jacob Gerner

AU - Jensen, Amalie Sofie

AU - Lassen, David Dreyer

PY - 2020/5/1

Y1 - 2020/5/1

N2 - In this article, we show that it is crucial to distinguish between liquid and illiquid wealth to understand how voters form preferences toward social insurance. Many households are financially fragile despite having high incomes and wealth, because they hold little liquid savings. We hypothesize, and show empirically, that this implies that a substantial group of voters show strong support for social insurance policies despite being wealthy and having high incomes, because of their limited ability to self-insure through own savings in case of an income shock. Our empirical analysis is based on a novel dataset from Denmark, which combines administrative data with high-quality measures of individual financial assets and survey measures of political preferences. Using data for other countries from the European Social Survey, we find evidence that our results hold more generally and are not specific to the Danish context.

AB - In this article, we show that it is crucial to distinguish between liquid and illiquid wealth to understand how voters form preferences toward social insurance. Many households are financially fragile despite having high incomes and wealth, because they hold little liquid savings. We hypothesize, and show empirically, that this implies that a substantial group of voters show strong support for social insurance policies despite being wealthy and having high incomes, because of their limited ability to self-insure through own savings in case of an income shock. Our empirical analysis is based on a novel dataset from Denmark, which combines administrative data with high-quality measures of individual financial assets and survey measures of political preferences. Using data for other countries from the European Social Survey, we find evidence that our results hold more generally and are not specific to the Danish context.

KW - political economy

KW - public opinion

KW - social welfare programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074337612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414019879718

DO - 10.1177/0010414019879718

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85074337612

SN - 0010-4140

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

ER -

Middle Class Without a Net: Savings, Financial Fragility, and Preferences Over Social Insurance

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this