Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy and dose-response relationships

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy and dose-response relationships

AU - Lundov, Michael D

AU - Zachariae, Claus

AU - Johansen, Jeanne D

N1 - © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Background. Methylisothiazolinone (MI) used alone is a new preservative causing a high prevalence of contact allergy. The eliciting threshold of MI is unknown. The combination of MI and phenoxyethanol enhances the antimicrobial efficacy of MI. Objectives. The eliciting doses of MI contact allergy in a patch test and a repeated open application test (ROAT) were investigated. In the patch test, it was determined whether phenoxyethanol influenced the reactivity to MI. Methods. Eleven MI-allergic individuals were patch tested with two dilution series of 12 doses of MI and the same 12 doses with phenoxyethanol. The ROAT mimicked the use of a cream preserved with 100, 50 and 5 ppm MI (corresponding to 0.21, 0.105 and 0.0105 μg MI/cm2). Results. Phenoxyethanol had no influence on the reactions to MI. The lowest eliciting dose in the patch test was 1.47 μg MI/cm2. In the ROAT, 7 patients (64%) reacted to 0.21 and 0.105 μg MI/cm2 and 2 patients (18%) reacted to 0.0105 μg MI/cm2, corresponding to a cream preserved with 5 ppm MI. Conclusions. A maximum of 100 ppm MI is permitted in cosmetic products. Eighteen per cent of MI-allergic patients reacted to a concentration 20 times lower in a ROAT. The amounts used in cosmetics should be reduced, and the development of MI contact allergy should be monitored closely.

AB - Background. Methylisothiazolinone (MI) used alone is a new preservative causing a high prevalence of contact allergy. The eliciting threshold of MI is unknown. The combination of MI and phenoxyethanol enhances the antimicrobial efficacy of MI. Objectives. The eliciting doses of MI contact allergy in a patch test and a repeated open application test (ROAT) were investigated. In the patch test, it was determined whether phenoxyethanol influenced the reactivity to MI. Methods. Eleven MI-allergic individuals were patch tested with two dilution series of 12 doses of MI and the same 12 doses with phenoxyethanol. The ROAT mimicked the use of a cream preserved with 100, 50 and 5 ppm MI (corresponding to 0.21, 0.105 and 0.0105 μg MI/cm2). Results. Phenoxyethanol had no influence on the reactions to MI. The lowest eliciting dose in the patch test was 1.47 μg MI/cm2. In the ROAT, 7 patients (64%) reacted to 0.21 and 0.105 μg MI/cm2 and 2 patients (18%) reacted to 0.0105 μg MI/cm2, corresponding to a cream preserved with 5 ppm MI. Conclusions. A maximum of 100 ppm MI is permitted in cosmetic products. Eighteen per cent of MI-allergic patients reacted to a concentration 20 times lower in a ROAT. The amounts used in cosmetics should be reduced, and the development of MI contact allergy should be monitored closely.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01901.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01901.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21504436

SN - 0105-1873

VL - 64

SP - 330

EP - 336

JO - Contact Dermatitis

JF - Contact Dermatitis

IS - 6

ER -