Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process

Alessandro Talia; Madeleine Miller-Bottome; Hannah Katznelson; Signe Holm Pedersen; Howard Steele; Paul Schröder; Amy Origlieri; Fredrik B Scharff; Guido Giovanardi; Mart Andersson; Vittorio Lingiardi; Jeremy D Safran; Susanne Lunn; Stig Bernt Poulsen; Svenja Taubner

doi:10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process

Alessandro Talia, Madeleine Miller-Bottome, Hannah Katznelson, Signe Holm Pedersen, Howard Steele, Paul Schröder, Amy Origlieri, Fredrik B Scharff, Guido Giovanardi, Mart Andersson, Vittorio Lingiardi, Jeremy D Safran, Susanne Lunn, Stig Bernt Poulsen, Svenja Taubner

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In this paper, we test the reliability and validity of two novel ways of assessing mentalizing in the therapy context: the Reflective Functioning scale (RF) applied to code psychotherapy transcripts (In-session RF), and the Exploring scale of the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS), which measures in-session autonomy and is linked with secure attachment in psychotherapy. Method: Before treatment, 160 patients in different types of psychotherapy and from three different countries were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), which was rated with the RF scale. One early psychotherapy session for each patient was independently rated with the In-session RF scale and with the PACS Exploring scale. Results: Both scales were found to be reliable and to have concurrent validity with the RF scale rated on the AAI, with the PACS Exploring scale found to be a better predictor of RF on the AAI. Conclusions: These results suggest that the PACS Exploring scale might be a practical method for assessing RF in psychotherapy research and a way for researchers and clinicians to track patients’ RF on an ongoing basis. These results also provide information regarding the ways in which differences in RF manifest during psychotherapy sessions.

Original language	English
Journal	Psychotherapy Research
Volume	29
Issue number	5
Pages (from-to)	652-665
ISSN	1050-3307
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

Faculty of Social Sciences

Access to Document

10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

Cite this

Talia, A., Miller-Bottome, M., Katznelson, H., Pedersen, S. H., Steele, H., Schröder, P., Origlieri, A., Scharff, F. B., Giovanardi, G., Andersson, M., Lingiardi, V., Safran, J. D., Lunn, S., Poulsen, S. B., & Taubner, S. (2019). Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process. Psychotherapy Research, 29(5), 652-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

Talia, A, Miller-Bottome, M, Katznelson, H, Pedersen, SH, Steele, H, Schröder, P, Origlieri, A, Scharff, FB, Giovanardi, G, Andersson, M, Lingiardi, V, Safran, JD, Lunn, S , Poulsen, SB & Taubner, S 2019, 'Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process', Psychotherapy Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 652-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

@article{c56ca11e49cd40938963f2da1f3a988e,

title = "Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process",

abstract = "Objective: In this paper, we test the reliability and validity of two novel ways of assessing mentalizing in the therapy context: the Reflective Functioning scale (RF) applied to code psychotherapy transcripts (In-session RF), and the Exploring scale of the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS), which measures in-session autonomy and is linked with secure attachment in psychotherapy. Method: Before treatment, 160 patients in different types of psychotherapy and from three different countries were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), which was rated with the RF scale. One early psychotherapy session for each patient was independently rated with the In-session RF scale and with the PACS Exploring scale. Results: Both scales were found to be reliable and to have concurrent validity with the RF scale rated on the AAI, with the PACS Exploring scale found to be a better predictor of RF on the AAI. Conclusions: These results suggest that the PACS Exploring scale might be a practical method for assessing RF in psychotherapy research and a way for researchers and clinicians to track patients{\textquoteright} RF on an ongoing basis. These results also provide information regarding the ways in which differences in RF manifest during psychotherapy sessions.",

keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Reflective Functioning scale, attachment, adult attachment interview, measure, assessment, language",

author = "Alessandro Talia and Madeleine Miller-Bottome and Hannah Katznelson and Pedersen, {Signe Holm} and Howard Steele and Paul Schr{\"o}der and Amy Origlieri and Scharff, {Fredrik B} and Guido Giovanardi and Mart Andersson and Vittorio Lingiardi and Safran, {Jeremy D} and Susanne Lunn and Poulsen, {Stig Bernt} and Svenja Taubner",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "652--665",

journal = "Psychotherapy Research",

issn = "1050-3307",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentalizing in the presence of another

T2 - Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process

AU - Talia, Alessandro

AU - Miller-Bottome, Madeleine

AU - Katznelson, Hannah

AU - Pedersen, Signe Holm

AU - Steele, Howard

AU - Schröder, Paul

AU - Origlieri, Amy

AU - Scharff, Fredrik B

AU - Giovanardi, Guido

AU - Andersson, Mart

AU - Lingiardi, Vittorio

AU - Safran, Jeremy D

AU - Lunn, Susanne

AU - Poulsen, Stig Bernt

AU - Taubner, Svenja

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objective: In this paper, we test the reliability and validity of two novel ways of assessing mentalizing in the therapy context: the Reflective Functioning scale (RF) applied to code psychotherapy transcripts (In-session RF), and the Exploring scale of the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS), which measures in-session autonomy and is linked with secure attachment in psychotherapy. Method: Before treatment, 160 patients in different types of psychotherapy and from three different countries were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), which was rated with the RF scale. One early psychotherapy session for each patient was independently rated with the In-session RF scale and with the PACS Exploring scale. Results: Both scales were found to be reliable and to have concurrent validity with the RF scale rated on the AAI, with the PACS Exploring scale found to be a better predictor of RF on the AAI. Conclusions: These results suggest that the PACS Exploring scale might be a practical method for assessing RF in psychotherapy research and a way for researchers and clinicians to track patients’ RF on an ongoing basis. These results also provide information regarding the ways in which differences in RF manifest during psychotherapy sessions.

AB - Objective: In this paper, we test the reliability and validity of two novel ways of assessing mentalizing in the therapy context: the Reflective Functioning scale (RF) applied to code psychotherapy transcripts (In-session RF), and the Exploring scale of the Patient Attachment Coding System (PACS), which measures in-session autonomy and is linked with secure attachment in psychotherapy. Method: Before treatment, 160 patients in different types of psychotherapy and from three different countries were administered the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), which was rated with the RF scale. One early psychotherapy session for each patient was independently rated with the In-session RF scale and with the PACS Exploring scale. Results: Both scales were found to be reliable and to have concurrent validity with the RF scale rated on the AAI, with the PACS Exploring scale found to be a better predictor of RF on the AAI. Conclusions: These results suggest that the PACS Exploring scale might be a practical method for assessing RF in psychotherapy research and a way for researchers and clinicians to track patients’ RF on an ongoing basis. These results also provide information regarding the ways in which differences in RF manifest during psychotherapy sessions.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Reflective Functioning scale

KW - attachment

KW - adult attachment interview

KW - measure

KW - assessment

KW - language

U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

DO - 10.1080/10503307.2017.1417651

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29298602

SN - 1050-3307

VL - 29

SP - 652

EP - 665

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

IS - 5

ER -

Mentalizing in the presence of another: Measuring reflective functioning and attachment in the therapy process

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this