Mendelian Randomisation Studies Do Not Support a Causal Role for Reduced Circulating Adiponectin Levels in Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes

Hanieh Yaghootkar, Claudia Lamina, Robert A Scott, Zari Dastani, Marie-France Hivert, Liling L Warren, Alena Stancáková, Sarah G Buxbaum, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Peter Henneman, Ying Wu, Chloe Yy Cheung, James S Pankow, Anne U Jackson, Stefan Gustafsson, Jing Hua Zhao, Christie M Ballantyne, Weijia Xie, Richard N Bergman, Michael BoehnkeFatiha El Bouazzaoui, Francis S Collins, Sandra H Dunn, Josee Dupuis, Nita G Forouhi, Christopher Gillson, Andrew T Hattersley, Jaeyoung Hong, Mika Kähönen, Johanna Kuusisto, Lyudmyla Kedenko, Florian Kronenberg, Alessandro Doria, Themistocles L Assimes, Ele Ferrannini, Torben Hansen, Ke Hao, Hans Häring, Joshua W Knowles, Cecilia M Lindgren, John J Nolan, Jussi Paananen, Oluf Pedersen, Thomas Quertermous, Ulf Smith, Terho Lehtimäki, Ching-Ti Liu, Ruth Jf Loos, Mark I McCarthy, Andrew D Morris, the GENESIS consortium

    85 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Adiponectin is strongly inversely associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, but its causal role remains controversial. We used a Mendelian randomization approach to test the hypothesis that adiponectin causally influences insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. We used genetic variants at the ADIPOQ gene as instruments to calculate a regression slope between adiponectin levels and metabolic traits (up to 31,000 individuals) and a combination of instrumental variables and summary statistics-based genetic risk scores to test the associations with gold-standard measures of insulin sensitivity (2,969 individuals) and type 2 diabetes (15,960 case subjects and 64,731 control subjects). In conventional regression analyses, a 1-SD decrease in adiponectin levels was correlated with a 0.31-SD (95% CI 0.26-0.35) increase in fasting insulin, a 0.34-SD (0.30-0.38) decrease in insulin sensitivity, and a type 2 diabetes odds ratio (OR) of 1.75 (1.47-2.13). The instrumental variable analysis revealed no evidence of a causal association between genetically lower circulating adiponectin and higher fasting insulin (0.02 SD; 95% CI 20.07 to 0.11; N = 29,771), nominal evidence of a causal relationship with lower insulin sensitivity (20.20 SD; 95% CI 20.38 to 20.02; N = 1,860), and no evidence of a relationship with type 2 diabetes (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.75-1.19; N = 2,777 case subjects and 13,011 control subjects). Using the ADIPOQ summary statistics genetic risk scores, we found no evidence of an association between adiponectin- lowering alleles and insulin sensitivity (effect per weighted adiponectin-lowering allele: 20.03 SD; 95% CI 20.07 to 0.01; N = 2,969) or type 2 diabetes (OR per weighted adiponectin-lowering allele: 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-1.04; 15,960 case subjects vs. 64,731 control subjects). These results do not provide any consistent evidence that interventions aimed at increasing adiponectin levels will improve insulin sensitivity or risk of type 2 diabetes.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalDiabetes
    Volume62
    Issue number10
    Pages (from-to)3589
    Number of pages3,598
    ISSN0046-0192
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mendelian Randomisation Studies Do Not Support a Causal Role for Reduced Circulating Adiponectin Levels in Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this