Material tools and meaning formation in mathematics

Mikkel Willum Johansen; Morten Misfeldt

Material tools and meaning formation in mathematics

History and Philosophy of Science and Science Studies

Abstract

In this talk we will present some of the main results of an empirical investigation of the practice of working mathematicians. The investigation shows that working mathematicians rely heavily on cognitive tools, such as computers and various types of external representations. The tools are used for several different purposes and different tools are used at different stages of the working process. In our talk we will focus on the use of external representations such as symbols, figures and diagrams, and we will explain the role played by such representations in the cognitive practice of working mathematicians. The use and purpose of external representations has been discussed heavily in the literature (see e.g. Allwein, G. & Barwise (1996), Kirsh (2010), Giaquinto (2007, 2011), De Cruz & De Smedt (2013), Johansen (2013)). However, our investigation of the actual practice of working mathematicians has revealed several new aspects. For this presentation we will especially focus on how mathematicians use external representations as a way to familiarize themselves with, or ascribe meaning to the mathematical objects they are working with, and how this process plays an important role in the heuristic treatment of mathematical problems.

Original language	English
Publication date	2014
Publication status	Published - 2014

Keywords

Mathematics

Cite this

@conference{70d44db96c51481991c2ce41f3b354e0,

title = "Material tools and meaning formation in mathematics",

abstract = "In this talk we will present some of the main results of an empirical investigation of the practice of working mathematicians. The investigation shows that working mathematicians rely heavily on cognitive tools, such as computers and various types of external representations. The tools are used for several different purposes and different tools are used at different stages of the working process. In our talk we will focus on the use of external representations such as symbols, figures and diagrams, and we will explain the role played by such representations in the cognitive practice of working mathematicians. The use and purpose of external representations has been discussed heavily in the literature (see e.g. Allwein, G. & Barwise (1996), Kirsh (2010), Giaquinto (2007, 2011), De Cruz & De Smedt (2013), Johansen (2013)). However, our investigation of the actual practice of working mathematicians has revealed several new aspects. For this presentation we will especially focus on how mathematicians use external representations as a way to familiarize themselves with, or ascribe meaning to the mathematical objects they are working with, and how this process plays an important role in the heuristic treatment of mathematical problems.",

keywords = "Mathematics",

author = "Johansen, {Mikkel Willum} and Morten Misfeldt",

note = "null ; Conference date: 25-09-2014 Through 27-09-2014",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Material tools and meaning formation in mathematics

AU - Johansen, Mikkel Willum

AU - Misfeldt, Morten

N1 - null ; Conference date: 25-09-2014 Through 27-09-2014

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this talk we will present some of the main results of an empirical investigation of the practice of working mathematicians. The investigation shows that working mathematicians rely heavily on cognitive tools, such as computers and various types of external representations. The tools are used for several different purposes and different tools are used at different stages of the working process. In our talk we will focus on the use of external representations such as symbols, figures and diagrams, and we will explain the role played by such representations in the cognitive practice of working mathematicians. The use and purpose of external representations has been discussed heavily in the literature (see e.g. Allwein, G. & Barwise (1996), Kirsh (2010), Giaquinto (2007, 2011), De Cruz & De Smedt (2013), Johansen (2013)). However, our investigation of the actual practice of working mathematicians has revealed several new aspects. For this presentation we will especially focus on how mathematicians use external representations as a way to familiarize themselves with, or ascribe meaning to the mathematical objects they are working with, and how this process plays an important role in the heuristic treatment of mathematical problems.

AB - In this talk we will present some of the main results of an empirical investigation of the practice of working mathematicians. The investigation shows that working mathematicians rely heavily on cognitive tools, such as computers and various types of external representations. The tools are used for several different purposes and different tools are used at different stages of the working process. In our talk we will focus on the use of external representations such as symbols, figures and diagrams, and we will explain the role played by such representations in the cognitive practice of working mathematicians. The use and purpose of external representations has been discussed heavily in the literature (see e.g. Allwein, G. & Barwise (1996), Kirsh (2010), Giaquinto (2007, 2011), De Cruz & De Smedt (2013), Johansen (2013)). However, our investigation of the actual practice of working mathematicians has revealed several new aspects. For this presentation we will especially focus on how mathematicians use external representations as a way to familiarize themselves with, or ascribe meaning to the mathematical objects they are working with, and how this process plays an important role in the heuristic treatment of mathematical problems.

KW - Mathematics

M3 - Paper

ER -