Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis

Vivian A. Welch; Elizabeth Ghogomu; Alomgir Hossain; Alison Riddle; Michelle Gaffey; Paul Arora; Omar Dewidar; Rehana Salaam; Simon Cousens; Robert Black; T. Déirdre Hollingsworth; Sue Horton; Peter Tugwell; Donald Bundy; Mary Christine Castro; Alison Eliott; Henrik Friis; Huong T. Le; Chengfang Liu; Emily K. Rousham; Fabian Rohner; Charles King; Erliyani Sartono; Taniawati Supali; Peter Steinmann; Emily Webb; Franck Wieringa; Pattanee Winnichagoon; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; George Wells

doi:10.1002/cl2.1058

Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis

Vivian A. Welch^*, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Alomgir Hossain, Alison Riddle, Michelle Gaffey, Paul Arora, Omar Dewidar, Rehana Salaam, Simon Cousens, Robert Black, T. Déirdre Hollingsworth, Sue Horton, Peter Tugwell, Donald Bundy, Mary Christine Castro, Alison Eliott, Henrik Friis, Huong T. Le, Chengfang Liu, Emily K. RoushamFabian Rohner, Charles King, Erliyani Sartono, Taniawati Supali, Peter Steinmann, Emily Webb, Franck Wieringa, Pattanee Winnichagoon, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, George Wells

^*Corresponding author for this work

Lifecourse Nutrition & Health

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Soil transmitted (or intestinal) helminths and schistosomes affect millions of children worldwide. Objectives: To use individual participant data network meta-analysis (NMA) to explore the effects of different types and frequency of deworming drugs on anaemia, cognition and growth across potential effect modifiers. Search Methods: We developed a search strategy with an information scientist to search MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts up to March 27, 2018. We also searched grey literature, websites, contacted authors and screened references of relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria: We included randomised and quasirandomised deworming trials in children for deworming compared to placebo or other interventions with data on baseline infection. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted NMA with individual participant data (IPD), using a frequentist approach for random-effects NMA. The covariates were: age, sex, weight, height, haemoglobin and infection intensity. The effect estimate chosen was the mean difference for the continuous outcome of interest. Results: We received data from 19 randomized controlled trials with 31,945 participants. Overall risk of bias was low. There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across any of the potential effect modifiers. However, analyses showed that there may be greater effects on weight for moderate to heavily infected children (very low certainty evidence). Authors' Conclusions: This analysis reinforces the case against mass deworming at a population-level, finding little effect on nutritional status or cognition. However, children with heavier intensity infections may benefit more. We urge the global community to adopt calls to make data available in open repositories to facilitate IPD analyses such as this, which aim to assess effects for the most vulnerable individuals.

Original language	English
Article number	e1058
Journal	Campbell Systematic Reviews
Volume	15
Issue number	4
ISSN	1891-1803
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1058
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2019

Access to Document

10.1002/cl2.1058

Cite this

Welch, V. A., Ghogomu, E., Hossain, A., Riddle, A., Gaffey, M., Arora, P., Dewidar, O., Salaam, R., Cousens, S., Black, R., Hollingsworth, T. D., Horton, S., Tugwell, P., Bundy, D., Castro, M. C., Eliott, A., Friis, H., Le, H. T., Liu, C., ... Wells, G. (2019). Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(4), [e1058]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1058

Welch, VA, Ghogomu, E, Hossain, A, Riddle, A, Gaffey, M, Arora, P, Dewidar, O, Salaam, R, Cousens, S, Black, R, Hollingsworth, TD, Horton, S, Tugwell, P, Bundy, D, Castro, MC, Eliott, A, Friis, H, Le, HT, Liu, C, Rousham, EK, Rohner, F, King, C, Sartono, E, Supali, T, Steinmann, P, Webb, E, Wieringa, F, Winnichagoon, P, Yazdanbakhsh, M, Bhutta, ZA & Wells, G 2019, 'Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis', Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 15, no. 4, e1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1058

@article{9f0c56104864409fadd63ffe691bb480,

title = "Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis",

abstract = "Background: Soil transmitted (or intestinal) helminths and schistosomes affect millions of children worldwide. Objectives: To use individual participant data network meta-analysis (NMA) to explore the effects of different types and frequency of deworming drugs on anaemia, cognition and growth across potential effect modifiers. Search Methods: We developed a search strategy with an information scientist to search MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts up to March 27, 2018. We also searched grey literature, websites, contacted authors and screened references of relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria: We included randomised and quasirandomised deworming trials in children for deworming compared to placebo or other interventions with data on baseline infection. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted NMA with individual participant data (IPD), using a frequentist approach for random-effects NMA. The covariates were: age, sex, weight, height, haemoglobin and infection intensity. The effect estimate chosen was the mean difference for the continuous outcome of interest. Results: We received data from 19 randomized controlled trials with 31,945 participants. Overall risk of bias was low. There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across any of the potential effect modifiers. However, analyses showed that there may be greater effects on weight for moderate to heavily infected children (very low certainty evidence). Authors' Conclusions: This analysis reinforces the case against mass deworming at a population-level, finding little effect on nutritional status or cognition. However, children with heavier intensity infections may benefit more. We urge the global community to adopt calls to make data available in open repositories to facilitate IPD analyses such as this, which aim to assess effects for the most vulnerable individuals.",

author = "Welch, {Vivian A.} and Elizabeth Ghogomu and Alomgir Hossain and Alison Riddle and Michelle Gaffey and Paul Arora and Omar Dewidar and Rehana Salaam and Simon Cousens and Robert Black and Hollingsworth, {T. D{\'e}irdre} and Sue Horton and Peter Tugwell and Donald Bundy and Castro, {Mary Christine} and Alison Eliott and Henrik Friis and Le, {Huong T.} and Chengfang Liu and Rousham, {Emily K.} and Fabian Rohner and Charles King and Erliyani Sartono and Taniawati Supali and Peter Steinmann and Emily Webb and Franck Wieringa and Pattanee Winnichagoon and Maria Yazdanbakhsh and Bhutta, {Zulfiqar A.} and George Wells",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/cl2.1058",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

journal = "Campbell Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1891-1803",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas

T2 - A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis

AU - Welch, Vivian A.

AU - Ghogomu, Elizabeth

AU - Hossain, Alomgir

AU - Riddle, Alison

AU - Gaffey, Michelle

AU - Arora, Paul

AU - Dewidar, Omar

AU - Salaam, Rehana

AU - Cousens, Simon

AU - Black, Robert

AU - Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre

AU - Horton, Sue

AU - Tugwell, Peter

AU - Bundy, Donald

AU - Castro, Mary Christine

AU - Eliott, Alison

AU - Friis, Henrik

AU - Le, Huong T.

AU - Liu, Chengfang

AU - Rousham, Emily K.

AU - Rohner, Fabian

AU - King, Charles

AU - Sartono, Erliyani

AU - Supali, Taniawati

AU - Steinmann, Peter

AU - Webb, Emily

AU - Wieringa, Franck

AU - Winnichagoon, Pattanee

AU - Yazdanbakhsh, Maria

AU - Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.

AU - Wells, George

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Background: Soil transmitted (or intestinal) helminths and schistosomes affect millions of children worldwide. Objectives: To use individual participant data network meta-analysis (NMA) to explore the effects of different types and frequency of deworming drugs on anaemia, cognition and growth across potential effect modifiers. Search Methods: We developed a search strategy with an information scientist to search MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts up to March 27, 2018. We also searched grey literature, websites, contacted authors and screened references of relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria: We included randomised and quasirandomised deworming trials in children for deworming compared to placebo or other interventions with data on baseline infection. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted NMA with individual participant data (IPD), using a frequentist approach for random-effects NMA. The covariates were: age, sex, weight, height, haemoglobin and infection intensity. The effect estimate chosen was the mean difference for the continuous outcome of interest. Results: We received data from 19 randomized controlled trials with 31,945 participants. Overall risk of bias was low. There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across any of the potential effect modifiers. However, analyses showed that there may be greater effects on weight for moderate to heavily infected children (very low certainty evidence). Authors' Conclusions: This analysis reinforces the case against mass deworming at a population-level, finding little effect on nutritional status or cognition. However, children with heavier intensity infections may benefit more. We urge the global community to adopt calls to make data available in open repositories to facilitate IPD analyses such as this, which aim to assess effects for the most vulnerable individuals.

AB - Background: Soil transmitted (or intestinal) helminths and schistosomes affect millions of children worldwide. Objectives: To use individual participant data network meta-analysis (NMA) to explore the effects of different types and frequency of deworming drugs on anaemia, cognition and growth across potential effect modifiers. Search Methods: We developed a search strategy with an information scientist to search MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts up to March 27, 2018. We also searched grey literature, websites, contacted authors and screened references of relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria: We included randomised and quasirandomised deworming trials in children for deworming compared to placebo or other interventions with data on baseline infection. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted NMA with individual participant data (IPD), using a frequentist approach for random-effects NMA. The covariates were: age, sex, weight, height, haemoglobin and infection intensity. The effect estimate chosen was the mean difference for the continuous outcome of interest. Results: We received data from 19 randomized controlled trials with 31,945 participants. Overall risk of bias was low. There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across any of the potential effect modifiers. However, analyses showed that there may be greater effects on weight for moderate to heavily infected children (very low certainty evidence). Authors' Conclusions: This analysis reinforces the case against mass deworming at a population-level, finding little effect on nutritional status or cognition. However, children with heavier intensity infections may benefit more. We urge the global community to adopt calls to make data available in open repositories to facilitate IPD analyses such as this, which aim to assess effects for the most vulnerable individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075925541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cl2.1058

DO - 10.1002/cl2.1058

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:85075925541

SN - 1891-1803

VL - 15

JO - Campbell Systematic Reviews

JF - Campbell Systematic Reviews

IS - 4

M1 - e1058

ER -

Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this