Abstract
This paper analyses the new provisions in EU law that trademark rules should be “applied in a way that ensures full respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the freedom of expression”. It is pointed out how these provisions are part of a broader trend of ‘constitiutionalization’ in EU law whereby courts increasingly rely on fundamental rights when they interpret the rules of IPR. After a presentation of the historical and legislative background for the changes and the related development in copyright law, the likely impact of the new trademark rules is discussed. It is concluded that even though the constitutionalization is not going to revolutionize EU trademark law, it will require courts to consider in a more pronounced way the interests of users’ of trade marks (such as artists or commercial users) vis-à-vis trade mark holders’ interests. This in turn may affect the way court interpret trade mark law and in particular give more room to the limitations and exceptions. The effects of such a development may be to limit the ability of trademark holders to push exclusivity in ways that harm cultural development, public debate and fair competition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | UC Irvine Law Review |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 555-581 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |