Lyme disease ecology in a changing world: consensus, uncertainty and critical gaps for improving control

A. Marm Kilpatrick, Andrew D.M. Dobson, Taal Levi, Daniel J. Salkeld, Andrea Swei, Howard S. Ginsberg, Anne Kjemtrup, Kerry A. Padgett, Per Moestrup Jensen, Durland Fish, Nick H. Ogden, Maria A. Diuk-Wasser

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne disease in temperate regions of North America, Europe and Asia, and the number of reported cases has increased in many regions as landscapes have been altered. Although there has been extensive work on the ecology and epidemiology of this disease in both Europe and North America, substantial uncertainty exists about fundamental aspects that determine spatial and temporal variation in both disease risk and human incidence, which hamper effective and efficient prevention and control. Here we describe areas of consensus that can be built on, identify areas of uncertainty and outline research needed to fill these gaps to facilitate predictive models of disease risk and the development of novel disease control strategies. Key areas of uncertainty include: (i) the precise influence of deer abundance on tick abundance, (ii) how tick populations are regulated, (iii) assembly of host communities and tick-feeding patterns across different habitats, (iv) reservoir competence of host species, and (v) pathogenicity for humans of different genotypes of Borrelia burgdorferi. Filling these knowledge gaps will improve Lyme disease prevention and control and provide general insights into the drivers and dynamics of this emblematic multi-host–vector-borne zoonotic disease.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20160117
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume372
Issue number1722
Number of pages15
ISSN0962-8436
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lyme disease ecology in a changing world: consensus, uncertainty and critical gaps for improving control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this