Looking hard: Eye tracking for detecting grammaticality of automatically compressed sentences

Sigrid Klerke, Hector Martinez Alonso, Anders Søgaard

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) tools are often developed with the intention of easing human processing, a goal which is hard to measure. Eye movements in reading are known to reflect aspects of the cognitive processing of text (Rayner et al., 2013). We explore how eye movements reflect aspects of reading that are of relevance to NLP system evaluation and development. This becomes increasingly relevant as eye tracking is becoming available in consumer products. In this paper we present an analysis of the differences between reading automatic sentence compressions and manually simplified newswire using eye-tracking experiments and readers' evaluations. We show that both manual simplification and automatic sentence compression provide texts that are easier to process than standard newswire, and that the main source of difficulty in processing machine-compressed text is ungrammaticality. Especially the proportion of regressions to previously read text is found to be sensitive to the differences in human- and computer-induced complexity. This finding is relevant for evaluation of automatic summarization, simplification and translation systems designed with the intention of facilitating human reading.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2015
Number of pages10
PublisherLinköping University Electronic Press
Publication date2015
Pages97-106
ISBN (Print)978-91-7519-098-3
Publication statusPublished - 2015
SeriesNEALT (Northern European Association of Language Technology) Proceedings Series
Volume23
ISSN1736-6305

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Looking hard: Eye tracking for detecting grammaticality of automatically compressed sentences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this